Hi Ram,
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti andi.shyti@linux.intel.com
but just two notes on the patchstyle, no need to resend:
1. would be nice to have [PATCH v2...] otherwise it's difficult to see if I'm reading the correct version. (I don't see the difficulty 'git format-patch -v 2...')
Add a new platform flag, has_64k_pages, to mark the requirement of 64K GTT page sizes or larger for device local memory access.
Also implies that we require or at least support the compact PT layout for the ppGTT when using 64K GTT pages.
v2: More explanation for the flag [Thomas]
Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers stuart.summers@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C ramalingam.c@intel.com Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi@intel.com
2. the tag part has a temporal meaning: Stuart has written the patch, Lucas has reviewed it and you are sending it, therefore, the correct order should be:
Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers stuart.summers@intel.com Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C ramalingam.c@intel.com
Thanks, Andi