On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Emil Velikov emil.l.velikov@gmail.com wrote:
In theory it's possible for any of the nouveau_getparam calls to fail whist the last one being successful.
Thus at least one of the following (hard requirements) drmVersion, chipset and vram/gart memory size will be filled with garbage and sent to the userspace drivers.
What was wrong with the old logic again? Except annoying indentation?
ret = nouveau_getparam(dev, NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_CHIPSET_ID, &chipset); if (ret == 0) ret = nouveau_getparam(dev, NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_FB_SIZE, &vram); if (ret == 0) ret = nouveau_getparam(dev, NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_AGP_SIZE, &gart); if (ret) { nouveau_device_del(&dev); return ret; }
It will only run each successive getparam if the previous one succeeded...
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov emil.l.velikov@gmail.com
nouveau/nouveau.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/nouveau/nouveau.c b/nouveau/nouveau.c index ee7893b..d6013db 100644 --- a/nouveau/nouveau.c +++ b/nouveau/nouveau.c @@ -88,27 +88,32 @@ nouveau_device_wrap(int fd, int close, struct nouveau_device **pdev) nvdev->base.fd = fd;
ver = drmGetVersion(fd);
if (ver) dev->drm_version = (ver->version_major << 24) |
(ver->version_minor << 8) |
ver->version_patchlevel;
if (!ver) {
ret = -errno;
goto error;
}
dev->drm_version = (ver->version_major << 24) |
(ver->version_minor << 8) |
ver->version_patchlevel; drmFreeVersion(ver); if ( dev->drm_version != 0x00000010 && (dev->drm_version < 0x01000000 || dev->drm_version >= 0x02000000)) {
nouveau_device_del(&dev);
return -EINVAL;
ret = -EINVAL;
goto error; } ret = nouveau_getparam(dev, NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_CHIPSET_ID, &chipset);
if (ret == 0)
if (ret)
goto error; ret = nouveau_getparam(dev, NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_FB_SIZE, &vram);
if (ret == 0)
if (ret)
goto error; ret = nouveau_getparam(dev, NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_AGP_SIZE, &gart);
if (ret) {
nouveau_device_del(&dev);
return ret;
}
if (ret)
goto error; ret = nouveau_getparam(dev, NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_HAS_BO_USAGE, &bousage); if (ret == 0)
@@ -139,6 +144,9 @@ nouveau_device_wrap(int fd, int close, struct nouveau_device **pdev)
*pdev = &nvdev->base; return 0;
+error:
nouveau_device_del(&dev);
return -ret;
you mean 'ret' of course.
}
int
1.9.0
dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel