Hi Thomas,
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Thomas Hellstrom thellstrom@vmware.com wrote:
NAK,
The mutex unlock is done in vmw_fifo_commit. The mutex is protecting the fifo memory against multiple simultaneous reservers.
Thanks for the answer :-). sorry for your time... i will definitely try more reading and analyse the code and then send patch if it needs really.
/Thomas
On 08/04/2012 07:33 AM, Devendra Naga wrote:
we have done a proper mutex_unlock in the error cases of the vmw_fifo_reserve, but there are missing mutex unlocks where we return a valid pointer in vmw_fifo_reserve.
Signed-off-by: Devendra Naga develkernel412222@gmail.com
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fifo.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fifo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fifo.c index a0c2f12..e3abd7a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fifo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fifo.c @@ -355,6 +355,7 @@ void *vmw_fifo_reserve(struct vmw_private *dev_priv, uint32_t bytes) if (reserveable) iowrite32(bytes, fifo_mem + SVGA_FIFO_RESERVED);
mutex_unlock(&fifo_state->fifo_mutex); return fifo_mem + (next_cmd >> 2); } else { need_bounce = true;
@@ -363,10 +364,12 @@ void *vmw_fifo_reserve(struct vmw_private *dev_priv, uint32_t bytes) if (need_bounce) { fifo_state->using_bounce_buffer = true;
if (bytes < fifo_state->static_buffer_size)
if (bytes < fifo_state->static_buffer_size) {
mutex_unlock(&fifo_state->fifo_mutex); return fifo_state->static_buffer;
else {
} else { fifo_state->dynamic_buffer =
vmalloc(bytes);
mutex_unlock(&fifo_state->fifo_mutex); return fifo_state->dynamic_buffer; } }