On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Peter Wu lekensteyn@gmail.com wrote:
Observe that nouveau_optimus_dsm and nouveau_dsm are equal except for the parameters handling (UUID, revision ID and function arguments). The function arguments are passed as Buffer in the "optimus dsm" and Integer in "nvidia dsm". As buffers are implicitly converted to integers, merge both functions.
The ACPI spec defines the fourth parameter (Arg3 a.k.a. "function arguments") as Package, but many BIOSes expect a Buffer instead. For instance, for the "nvidia DSM", the Lenovo T410s uses CreateByteField on Arg3 which does not work with a package. The Clevo B7130 does something similar for the "Optimus DSM". Unfortunately, this means that the following ACPI warning (introduced with 29a241c) cannot be fixed (when toggling power or muxing):
By cannot be fixed, why is it there then? maybe ask the ACPI folks to drop this error, since as far as I can see all optimus dsm want a buffer here.
Dave.
ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130517/nsarguments-95) ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130517/nsarguments-95) ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130517/nsarguments-95) ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.PEGP._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130517/nsarguments-95)Signed-off-by: Peter Wu lekensteyn@gmail.com
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c | 67 ++++++++++------------------------ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c index d97f200..a75684f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ bool nouveau_is_v1_dsm(void) { #define NOUVEAU_DSM_HAS_MUX 0x1 #define NOUVEAU_DSM_HAS_OPT 0x2
+#define NOUVEAU_DSM_REVID_NVIDIA 0x102 +#define NOUVEAU_DSM_REVID_OPTIMUS 0x100
static const char nouveau_dsm_muid[] = { 0xA0, 0xA0, 0x95, 0x9D, 0x60, 0x00, 0x48, 0x4D, 0xB3, 0x4D, 0x7E, 0x5F, 0xEA, 0x12, 0x9F, 0xD4, @@ -56,7 +59,8 @@ static const char nouveau_op_dsm_muid[] = { 0xA7, 0x2B, 0x60, 0x42, 0xA6, 0xB5, 0xBE, 0xE0, };
-static int nouveau_optimus_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func, int arg, uint32_t *result) +static int nouveau_call_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const char *uuid, int revid,
int func, int arg, uint32_t *result){ struct acpi_buffer output = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL }; struct acpi_object_list input; @@ -68,12 +72,15 @@ static int nouveau_optimus_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func, int arg, uint32_t * input.count = 4; input.pointer = params; params[0].type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER;
params[0].buffer.length = sizeof(nouveau_op_dsm_muid);params[0].buffer.pointer = (char *)nouveau_op_dsm_muid;
params[0].buffer.length = 16;params[0].buffer.pointer = (char *)uuid; params[1].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
params[1].integer.value = 0x00000100;
params[1].integer.value = revid; params[2].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER; params[2].integer.value = func;/* Although the ACPI spec defines Arg3 as a Package, in practise* implementations expect a Buffer (CreateWordField and Index functions* are applied to it). */ params[3].type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER; params[3].buffer.length = 4; /* ACPI is little endian, AABBCCDD becomes {DD,CC,BB,AA} */@@ -108,50 +115,16 @@ static int nouveau_optimus_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func, int arg, uint32_t * return 0; }
-static int nouveau_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func, int arg, uint32_t *result) -{
struct acpi_buffer output = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };struct acpi_object_list input;union acpi_object params[4];union acpi_object *obj;int err;input.count = 4;input.pointer = params;params[0].type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER;params[0].buffer.length = sizeof(nouveau_dsm_muid);params[0].buffer.pointer = (char *)nouveau_dsm_muid;params[1].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;params[1].integer.value = 0x00000102;params[2].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;params[2].integer.value = func;params[3].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;params[3].integer.value = arg;err = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_DSM", &input, &output);if (err) {printk(KERN_INFO "failed to evaluate _DSM: %d\n", err);return err;}obj = (union acpi_object *)output.pointer;if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER)if (obj->integer.value == 0x80000002)return -ENODEV;if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {if (obj->buffer.length == 4 && result) {*result = 0;*result |= obj->buffer.pointer[0];*result |= (obj->buffer.pointer[1] << 8);*result |= (obj->buffer.pointer[2] << 16);*result |= (obj->buffer.pointer[3] << 24);}}+static int nouveau_optimus_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func,
int arg, uint32_t *result) {return nouveau_call_dsm(handle, nouveau_op_dsm_muid,NOUVEAU_DSM_REVID_OPTIMUS, func, arg, result);+}
kfree(output.pointer);return 0;+static int nouveau_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func,
int arg, uint32_t *result) {return nouveau_call_dsm(handle, nouveau_dsm_muid,NOUVEAU_DSM_REVID_NVIDIA, func, arg, result);}
/* Returns 1 if a DSM function is usable and 0 otherwise */
1.8.3.4
dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel