I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu chuansheng.liu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Baole Ni baolex.ni@intel.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c index 7df26d4..60891eb 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c @@ -1050,7 +1050,7 @@ int drm_edid_header_is_valid(const u8 *raw_edid) EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_edid_header_is_valid);
static int edid_fixup __read_mostly = 6; -module_param_named(edid_fixup, edid_fixup, int, 0400); +module_param_named(edid_fixup, edid_fixup, int, S_IRUSR); MODULE_PARM_DESC(edid_fixup, "Minimum number of valid EDID header bytes (0-8, default 6)");