On 1/26/22 00:25, Doug Anderson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 2:55 PM Javier Martinez Canillas javierm@redhat.com wrote:
[snip]
Should this new sysfs entry be documented in Documentation/ABI/ ?
I'm not sure what the policy is here. I actually don't know that I'm too worried about this being an ABI. For the purposes of our tests then if something about this file changed (path changed or something like that) it wouldn't be a huge deal. Presumably the test itself would just "fail" in this case and that would clue us in that the ABI changed and we could adapt to whatever new way was needed to discover this.
That being said, if the policy is that everything in sysfs is supposed to be ABI then I can add documentation for this...
I also don't know the policy, hence the question. But in any case, I think that it could even be done as a follow-up if is needed.
Best regards,