-----Original Message----- From: Lyude Paul lyude@redhat.com Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2019 8:23 AM To: Lin, Wayne Wayne.Lin@amd.com; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Kazlauskas, Nicholas Nicholas.Kazlauskas@amd.com; Wentland, Harry Harry.Wentland@amd.com; Zuo, Jerry Jerry.Zuo@amd.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/dp_mst: Correct the bug in drm_dp_update_payload_part1()
On Mon, 2019-12-02 at 11:58 +0800, Wayne Lin wrote:
[Why] If the payload_state is DP_PAYLOAD_DELETE_LOCAL in series, current code doesn't delete the payload at current index and just move the index to next one after shuffling payloads.
[How] After shuffling payloads, decide whether to move on index or not according to payload_state of current payload.
Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin Wayne.Lin@amd.com
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c index 81e92b260d7a..8da5d461ea01 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c @@ -3176,7 +3176,8 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr) drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port); }
- for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) {
- for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads;
(mgr->payloads[i].payload_state == DP_PAYLOAD_DELETE_LOCAL) ?
i : i++) {
Took me a moment to figure out what this line was actually doing. Nice catch by the way!
Anyway: let's just drop this line to avoid making things confusing to read, drop i++ from the for loop instead, and just rewrite it so it looks like this:
for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; /* do nothing */) { if (mgr->payloads[i].payload_state != DP_PAYLOAD_DELETE_LOCAL) { i++; continue; }
With those changes, this patch is:
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul lyude@redhat.com
Thanks for your time and sorry for not well organized code. I will send you the v2 right away. Thanks!
I can go ahead and push these patches to drm-misc for you once you've sent me the v2
if (mgr->payloads[i].payload_state != DP_PAYLOAD_DELETE_LOCAL) continue;
-- Cheers, Lyude Paul
-- BR, Wayne Lin