Am Mittwoch, 23. März 2016, 07:44:59 schrieb Inki Dae:
- Ajay kumar with Samsung email
Hi,
2016년 03월 23일 07:12에 Heiko Stübner 이(가) 쓴 글:
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 22. März 2016, 16:19:37 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
On 03/18/2016 07:53 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Caesar Wang caesar.upstream@gmail.com
wrote:
Same here, this is the second time I tested this series (first time was v6 on October 25 [2]) and I think that has been out there for too long.
Tested-by: Douglas Anderson dianders@chromium.org
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas javier@osg.samsung.com
So we have 3 tests (Doug, Caesar and me) for the Rockchip side as well as Javier for the Exynos side based on the most recent drm state.
As said by a lot of people it would be cool to get this merged soon - hopefully directly after -rc1. The only remaining question is through which tree it should go.
I guess there are two basic options:
- Inki takes the series - we could see the Rockchip-Ack being implied but
maybe Mark can provide an explicit one
- Mark takes the series with an Ack from Inki for the shared parts
Inki, Mark do you have a preference?
The problem would be that there is no drm bridge maintainer. I think the most suitable person as the maintainer would be Ajay Kumar who is an author of drm bridge framework. Of course, I could take them and have pull-request again. But it seems a little late. Dave had already pull-request.
I really meant that for 4.7, not for the current merge window. I just want to make sure it goes into a maintainer tree shortly after v4.6-rc1, before something else changes the exynos-dp again :-) .
To Ajay, How about adding you as a drm bridge maintainer? DRM SoC driver maintainers would need a person who can manage the drm bridge relevant pathes.
The previous example (dw_hdmi generalization between imx and rockchip) did just go through the imx tree. So either the Samsung or Rockchip drm-trees might be enough?
Heiko