On 6/8/2022 3:00 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 7:52 AM Akhil P Oommen akhilpo@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 9/27/2021 8:59 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
From: Rob Clark robdclark@chromium.org
I've seen a few crashes like:
Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000010 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: snd_seq_dummy snd_seq snd_seq_device bridge stp llc tun nf_nat_tftp nf_conntrack_tftp nf_nat_ftp nf_conntrack_ftp esp6 ah6 ip6t_REJECT ip6t_ipv6header vhost_vsock vhost vmw_vsock_virtio_transport_common vsock rfcomm algif_hash algif_skcipher af_alg uinput veth xt_cgroup xt_MASQUERADE venus_enc venus_dec videobuf2_dma_contig qcom_spmi_adc5 qcom_spmi_adc_tm5 hci_uart qcom_vadc_common cros_ec_typec qcom_spmi_temp_alarm typec btqca snd_soc_rt5682_i2c snd_soc_rt5682 snd_soc_sc7180 bluetooth snd_soc_qcom_common snd_soc_rl6231 ecdh_generic ecc venus_core v4l2_mem2mem snd_soc_lpass_sc7180 snd_soc_lpass_hdmi snd_soc_lpass_cpu snd_soc_lpass_platform snd_soc_max98357a ip6table_nat fuse iio_trig_sysfs cros_ec_lid_angle cros_ec_sensors cros_ec_sensors_core industrialio_triggered_buffer kfifo_buf cros_ec_sensorhub lzo_rle ath10k_snoc lzo_compress ath10k_core ath zram mac80211 cfg80211 ax88179_178a usbnet mii uvcvideo videobuf2_vmalloc joydev CPU: 3 PID: 212 Comm: A618-worker Tainted: G W 5.4.139-16300-g88d8e1285982 #1 Hardware name: Google Pompom (rev1) with LTE (DT) pstate: 60c00009 (nZCv daif +PAN +UAO) pc : a6xx_gmu_set_oob+0x114/0x200 lr : a6xx_gmu_set_oob+0x10c/0x200 sp : ffffffc011b7bc20 x29: ffffffc011b7bc20 x28: ffffffdad27c5000 x27: 0000000000000001 x26: ffffffdad1521044 x25: ffffffbef7498338 x24: 0000000000000018 x23: 0000000000000002 x22: 0000000000014648 x21: 0000033732fe638b x20: 0000000080000000 x19: ffffffbef7433bc8 x18: 0000000040000000 x17: 000000243508d982 x16: 000000000000b67e x15: 00000000000090d4 x14: 0000000000000024 x13: 0000000000000024 x12: 0000000000017521 x11: 0000000000000b48 x10: 0000000000326a48 x9 : 1a130d33f6371600 x8 : ffffffc011e54648 x7 : 614948e00005003c x6 : ffffffbe3cd17e60 x5 : 0000000000000040 x4 : 0000000000000004 x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : ffffffbef7488000 x1 : ffffffbef7488000 x0 : 0000000000000000 Call trace: a6xx_gmu_set_oob+0x114/0x200 a6xx_gmu_set_freq+0xe0/0x1fc msm_devfreq_target+0x80/0x13c msm_devfreq_idle+0x54/0x94 retire_submit+0x170/0x254 retire_submits+0xa4/0xdc retire_worker+0x1c/0x28 kthread_worker_fn+0xf4/0x1bc kthread+0x140/0x158 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 Code: 52800c81 9415bbe5 f9400a68 8b160108 (b9400108) ---[ end trace 16b871df2482cd61 ]--- Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception SMP: stopping secondary CPUs Kernel Offset: 0x1ac1400000 from 0xffffffc010000000 PHYS_OFFSET: 0xffffffc280000000 CPU features: 0x88102e,2a80aa38 Memory Limit: noneWhich smells a lot like touching hw after power collapse. I'm not *entirely* sure how it could have taken 66ms (the autosuspend delay) before we get to a6xx_gmu_set_oob(), but to be safe we should move the pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() after msm_devfreq_idle().
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.15-rc1/source/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno... We have this check in the gmu freq set path which should avoid this scenario. I might be a bit pedantic here, but I feel that the original code is more accurate. We should immediately mark last busy and put runtime_pm refcount.
So, I've been doing some experiments, changing the _put_autosuspend() to _put_sync(), in the course of tracking down some remaining "GMU OOB" timeout type issues and related badness, and discovered things very quickly die with SError splats like below. Possibly the issue is that runpm has some race conditions, but I'm not sure we can trust pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() quite as much as one would like..
[ 33.225332] CPU: 0 PID: 216 Comm: A618-worker Tainted: G W 5.4.196 #7 [ 33.225337] Hardware name: Google Wormdingler rev1+ INX panel board (DT) [ 33.225343] pstate: 20c00009 (nzCv daif +PAN +UAO) [ 33.225353] pc : msm_readl+0x14/0x34 [ 33.225361] lr : a6xx_gpu_busy+0x40/0x80 [ 33.225365] sp : ffffffc011b93ad0 [ 33.225371] x29: ffffffc011b93ad0 x28: ffffffe77cba3000 [ 33.225377] x27: 0000000000000001 x26: ffffffe77bb4c4ac [ 33.225384] x25: ffffffa2f227dfa0 x24: ffffffa2f22aab28 [ 33.225390] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: ffffffa2f22bf020 [ 33.225397] x21: ffffffa2f22bf000 x20: ffffffc011b93b10 [ 33.225404] x19: ffffffc011bd4110 x18: 000000000000000e [ 33.225410] x17: 0000000000000004 x16: 000000000000000c [ 33.225416] x15: 000001be3a969450 x14: 0000000000000400 [ 33.225423] x13: 00000000000101d6 x12: 0000000034155555 [ 33.225429] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000000000 [ 33.225436] x9 : 0000000100000000 x8 : ffffffc011bd4000 [ 33.225443] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000007 [ 33.225450] x5 : ffffffc01d8b38f0 x4 : 0000000000000000 [ 33.225457] x3 : 00000000ffffffff x2 : 0000000000000002 [ 33.225463] x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffffffc011bd4110 [ 33.225471] Call trace: [ 33.225478] msm_readl+0x14/0x34 [ 33.225484] a6xx_gpu_busy+0x40/0x80 [ 33.225490] msm_devfreq_get_dev_status+0x70/0x1d0 [ 33.225500] devfreq_simple_ondemand_func+0x34/0x100 [ 33.225510] update_devfreq+0x50/0xe8 [ 33.225517] qos_notifier_call+0x2c/0x64 [ 33.225523] qos_max_notifier_call+0x1c/0x2c [ 33.225532] notifier_call_chain+0x58/0x98 [ 33.225539] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x74/0x84 [ 33.225545] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x38/0x48 [ 33.225554] pm_qos_update_target+0xf8/0x19c [ 33.225560] freq_qos_apply+0x54/0x6c [ 33.225566] apply_constraint+0x60/0x104 [ 33.225572] __dev_pm_qos_update_request+0xb4/0x184 [ 33.225578] dev_pm_qos_update_request+0x38/0x58 [ 33.225584] msm_devfreq_idle_work+0x34/0x40 [ 33.225591] kthread_worker_fn+0x144/0x1c8 [ 33.225597] kthread+0x140/0x284 [ 33.225604] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 [ 33.225617] Code: f9000bf3 910003fd aa0003f3 d503201f (b9400260) [ 33.225623] ---[ end trace f6309767a42d0831 ]--- [ 33.236185] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs [ 33.236186] Kernel Offset: 0x276b600000 from 0xffffffc010000000 [ 33.236186] PHYS_OFFSET: 0xffffffdf80000000 [ 33.236187] CPU features: 0x088102e,2a80aa38
Any chance we are racing with system suspend here? Because, when "dev->power.disable_depth > 0", pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() returns -EINVAL. Then I guess we should look for a positive return value from pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() before proceeding.
-Akhil.
-Akhil.
Fixes: 9bc95570175a ("drm/msm: Devfreq tuning") Signed-off-by: Rob Clark robdclark@chromium.org
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c index d1a16642ecd5..2b2bbe7499e6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c @@ -667,9 +667,6 @@ static void retire_submit(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct msm_ringbuffer *ring,
msm_submit_retire(submit);
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&gpu->pdev->dev);pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&gpu->pdev->dev);spin_lock_irqsave(&ring->submit_lock, flags); list_del(&submit->node); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ring->submit_lock, flags);@@ -683,6 +680,9 @@ static void retire_submit(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct msm_ringbuffer *ring, mutex_unlock(&gpu->active_lock);
msm_gem_submit_put(submit);
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&gpu->pdev->dev);pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&gpu->pdev->dev);}
static void retire_submits(struct msm_gpu *gpu)