From: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
[ Upstream commit 86c1c87d0e6241cbe35bd52badfc84b154e1b959 ]
According to intel_read_wm_latency() it is perfectly legal for one WM and all subsequent levels to be 0 (and the deeper powersaving states disabled), so don't shout *ERROR*, over and over again.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: Maarten Lankhorst maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Cc: Ville Syrjala ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180726161527.10516-1-chris@c... Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@microsoft.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c index 96a5237741e0..cb377b003321 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c @@ -2934,8 +2934,8 @@ static void intel_print_wm_latency(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, unsigned int latency = wm[level];
if (latency == 0) { - DRM_ERROR("%s WM%d latency not provided\n", - name, level); + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s WM%d latency not provided\n", + name, level); continue; }