Robert Foss robert.foss@collabora.com writes:
On 2016-05-03 03:22 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
robert.foss@collabora.com writes:
From: Robert Foss robert.foss@collabora.com
As per the documentation in drm_crtc.h, atomic_commit should return -EBUSY if an asycnhronous update is requested and there is an earlier update pending.
Note: docs cited here are drm_crtc.h, and the whole quote is:
* - -EBUSY, if an asynchronous updated is requested and there is * an earlier updated pending. Drivers are allowed to support a queue * of outstanding updates, but currently no driver supports that. * Note that drivers must wait for preceding updates to complete if a * synchronous update is requested, they are not allowed to fail the * commit in that case.
Signed-off-by: Robert Foss robert.foss@collabora.com
This looks good to me. Let's give it a few days on the list for any other KMS folks to catch anything.
I haven't seen any further feedback regarding this patch. Does anyone have objections to it being merged?
I merged it to drm-vc4-next last night, actually :)