Hi Steven,
On 16 October 2017 at 20:07, Steven Rostedt rostedt@goodmis.org wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 11:15:45 +0200 Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 05:27:59PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Am 13.10.2017 um 16:06 schrieb Steven Rostedt:
From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) rostedt@goodmis.org
Commit e941759c74 ("fence: dma-buf cross-device synchronization") added trace event fence_annotate_wait_on, but never used it. It was renamed to dma_fence_annotate_wait_on by commit f54d186700 ("dma-buf: Rename struct fence to dma_fence") but still not used. As defined trace events have data structures and functions created for them, it is a waste of memory if they are not used. Remove the unused trace event.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) rostedt@goodmis.org
Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com
Since you have commit rights to drm-misc I assume you'll push this too.
Will it cause conflict if I pull it through my tree? It's just removing unused traecpoints. I added it to my tree already (but haven't pushed it to linux-next yet), with the Reviewed by from Christian. Is that OK? It shouldn't cause any merge conflicts that Linus can't handle.
I suspect it should be ok; please do feel free to add my Acked-by: Sumit Semwal sumit.semwal@linaro.org if you wish :)
-- Steve _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Best, Sumit.