On Thu, 2021-05-27 at 17:01 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
On Thu, 2021-05-27 at 16:54 +0200, Christian König wrote:
Am 27.05.21 um 16:19 schrieb Thomas Hellström:
The swapping code was dereference bo->ttm pointers without having the dma-resv lock held. Also it might try to swap out unpopulated bos.
Fix this by moving the bo->ttm dereference until we have the reservation lock. Check that the ttm_tt is populated after the swap_notify callback.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström
thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 16 +++++++++++++++- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c | 8 +++----- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c index 9f53506a82fc..86213d37657b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c @@ -1163,6 +1163,16 @@ int ttm_bo_swapout(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx, if (!ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable(bo, ctx, &place, &locked, NULL)) return -EBUSY; + dma_resv_assert_held(bo->base.resv);
+ if (!bo->ttm || + bo->ttm->page_flags & TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SG || + bo->ttm->page_flags & TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SWAPPED) { + if (locked) + dma_resv_unlock(bo->base.resv); + return -EBUSY; + }
if (!ttm_bo_get_unless_zero(bo)) { if (locked) dma_resv_unlock(bo->base.resv); @@ -1215,7 +1225,8 @@ int ttm_bo_swapout(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx, if (bo->bdev->funcs->swap_notify) bo->bdev->funcs->swap_notify(bo); - ret = ttm_tt_swapout(bo->bdev, bo->ttm, gfp_flags); + if (ttm_tt_is_populated(bo->ttm)) + ret = ttm_tt_swapout(bo->bdev, bo->ttm, gfp_flags);
Exactly that is what I won't recommend. We would try to swap out the same BO over and over again with that.
But we wouldn't since the BO is taken off the LRU and never re-added,
In fact, we'd probably might want to take the !bo->ttm bos off the LRU as well..
/Thomas