On Thursday, February 13, 2014 09:13:58 PM Yijing Wang wrote:
Replace list_for_each() + pci_bus_b() with the simpler list_for_each_entry().
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang wangyijing@huawei.com
Looks reasonable to me.
Does it conflict with anything currently in linux-next (the linux-next branch of linux-pm.git in particular)?
drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c | 6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c index cd929ae..aee6a0a 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static void cleanup_bridge(struct acpiphp_bridge *bridge) */ static unsigned char acpiphp_max_busnr(struct pci_bus *bus) {
- struct list_head *tmp;
struct pci_bus *tmp; unsigned char max, n;
/*
@@ -463,8 +463,8 @@ static unsigned char acpiphp_max_busnr(struct pci_bus *bus) */ max = bus->busn_res.start;
- list_for_each(tmp, &bus->children) {
n = pci_bus_max_busnr(pci_bus_b(tmp));
- list_for_each_entry(tmp, &bus->children, node) {
n = pci_bus_max_busnr(tmp);