On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 09:53:37PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
While reviewing patches for handling workarounds related to gen9 bc, Imre from Intel discovered that we're using spt_hpd_irq_setup() on ICP+ PCHs despite it being almost the same as icp_hpd_irq_setup(). Since we need to be calling icp_hpd_irq_setup() to ensure that CML-S/TGP platforms function correctly anyway, let's move platforms using PCH_ICP which aren't handled by gen11_hpd_irq_setup() over to icp_hpd_irq_setup().
Cc: Tejas Upadhyay tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul lyude@redhat.com
makes sense to me...
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c index f86b147f588f..7ec61187a315 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c @@ -4320,6 +4320,8 @@ void intel_irq_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = gen11_hpd_irq_setup; else if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = bxt_hpd_irq_setup;
else if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev_priv) >= PCH_ICP)dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = icp_hpd_irq_setup;-- 2.29.2
dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel