At Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:33:37 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson ajax@redhat.com
include/drm/drm_edid.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_edid.h b/include/drm/drm_edid.h index bcb9a66..8cefbbe 100644 --- a/include/drm/drm_edid.h +++ b/include/drm/drm_edid.h @@ -90,12 +90,26 @@ struct detailed_data_monitor_range { u8 min_hfreq_khz; u8 max_hfreq_khz; u8 pixel_clock_mhz; /* need to multiply by 10 */
- __le16 sec_gtf_toggle; /* A000=use above, 20=use below */
- u8 hfreq_start_khz; /* need to multiply by 2 */
- u8 c; /* need to divide by 2 */
- __le16 m;
- u8 k;
- u8 j; /* need to divide by 2 */
- u8 flags;
- union {
struct {u8 reserved;u8 hfreq_start_khz; /* need to multiply by 2 */u8 c; /* need to divide by 2 */__le16 m;u8 k;u8 j; /* need to divide by 2 */} gtf2;struct {u8 version;u8 data1; /* high 6 bits: extra clock resolution */u8 data2; /* plus low 2 of above: max hactive */u8 supported_aspects;u8 flags; /* preferred aspect and blanking support */u8 supported_scalings;u8 preferred_refresh;} cvt;
These new structs must be marked with __attribute__((packed)) although the struct detailed_data_monitor_range itself is already marked. At least, with gcc 4.6 and x86-64 here, they get unaligned.
thanks,
Takashi
- } formula;
} __attribute__((packed));
struct detailed_data_wpindex {
1.7.7.6
Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx