On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 11:01:36PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 3:34 AM Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi@intel.com wrote:
The check for config value doesn't really belong to i915_utils.h - we are trying to eliminate that utils helper and share them when possible with other drivers and subsystems.
Rationale for having such macro is in commit babaab2f4738 ("drm/i915: Encapsulate kconfig constant values inside boolean predicates") whereas later it is improved to not break the build if used with undefined configs. The caveat is detailed in the documentation: unlike IS_ENABLED(): it's not preprocessor-only logic so can't be used for things like `#if IS_CONFIG_NONZERO(...)`
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Hypothetical "it would be nice to have ..." is really unneeded.
if (context && CONFIG_DRM_I915_FENCE_TIMEOUT > 0) returnmsecs_to_jiffies_timeout(CONFIG_DRM_I915_FENCE_TIMEOUT);
is enough, and much cleaner.
This warning is shown only when a constant is used together with '&&'.
Most of IS_ACTIVE can go away.
Given that, there are not many places where the IS_ACTIVE macro is useful, even in the i915 driver.
For a few sources of the warnings, replacing it with != 0 or > 0 is just fine.
humn... maybe. Let me do a conversion in that direction and see what is the outcome.
My original intention was to make IS_ENABLED() even uglier to cover the int case, but after some tries it seems impossible to do on preprocessor context, so I thought maybe it would be ok as a separate one.
Of course, such an ugly macro is not worth being moved to <linux/kconfig.h>
if we don't handle the undefined case and only worry about encapsulating it inside a boolean predicate, the macro would be very simple. Would that be worth having in kconfig.h maybe?
thanks Lucas De Marchi