6 Sep
2012
6 Sep
'12
1:01 p.m.
On Don, 2012-09-06 at 13:46 +0200, Christian König wrote:
On 06.09.2012 12:53, Michel Dänzer wrote:
From: Michel Dänzer michel.daenzer@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer michel.daenzer@amd.com
Sounds good to me, but shouldn't we also increase the version number?
Assuming you mean the libdrm package version, I don't think it's worth doing that just for these fixes. At this point, one should always use latest Git of mesa and libdrm for radeonsi. But of course, once a libdrm release is out with these fixes, we can require that as the minimum version for radeonsi.
Anyway: Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com
Thanks, is that for the whole series?
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer