On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Jean Delvare khali@linux-fr.org wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:39:35 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Jean Delvare khali@linux-fr.org wrote:
Hi Florian,
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 13:28:15 +0200, Florian Mickler wrote:
On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 19:34:56 -0000 Jean Delvare khali@linux-fr.org wrote:
Revert commit 8f9a3f9b63b8cd3f03be9dc53533f90bd4120e5f. This fixes a hang when loading the eeprom driver (see bug #35572.) GMBUS will be re-enabled later, differently.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare khali@linux-fr.org Reported-by: Marek Otahal markotahal@gmail.com Tested-by: Yermandu Patapitafious yermandu.dev@gmail.com Tested-by: Andrew Lutomirski luto@mit.edu Acked-by: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: David Airlie airlied@linux.ie
is this[1] resolved some other way in the meantime?
Regards, Flo
Not that I know of (and I don't see any other way at least for 2.6.39.) This is a shame, really, my revert patch should have been applied several days ago already.
Keith, Chris, David, can you please get it rolling? This is a regression presumably affecting a lot of users, we should really fix it quickly, both in 2.6.39.x and 3.0-rc.
This patch really had no info other than the bug link to tell me wtf its doing,
The patch I sent on June 4th (Message-ID: 20110604213456.7ac5588e@endymion.delvare) says:
Revert commit 8f9a3f9b63b8cd3f03be9dc53533f90bd4120e5f. This fixes a hang when loading the eeprom driver (see bug #35572.) GMBUS will be re-enabled later, differently.
Seems clear enough to me.
Hi Jean,
yeah I talked to Chris and I then spotted I was applying this in the wrong place when looking at the code by hand,
Once Chris explained I got it, will push soon.
Dave.