On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 02:39:51PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
It was reported that this comment was confusing, and indeed it is.
Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau damien.lespiau@intel.com
include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h index ff57f07..eacd063 100644 --- a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h +++ b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h @@ -171,8 +171,12 @@ typedef struct _drm_i915_sarea { #define I915_BOX_TEXTURE_LOAD 0x8 #define I915_BOX_LOST_CONTEXT 0x10
-/* I915 specific ioctls
- The device specific ioctl range is 0x40 to 0x79.
+/*
- i915 specific ioctls.
- The device specific ioctl range is [DRM_COMMAND_BASE, DRM_COMMAND_END) ie
- [0x40, 0xa0) (a0 is excluded) and those defines are offsets from
- DRM_COMMAND_BASE.
Maybe do the math for us and say what's the largest relative ioctl number for i915? -Daniel
*/ #define DRM_I915_INIT 0x00
#define DRM_I915_FLUSH 0x01
1.8.3.1
Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx