Hi Rob,
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 06:44:53PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:46:18 +0200, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
DP_INTF is a similar functional block to mediatek,dpi but is different in that it serves the DisplayPort controller on mediatek SoCs and uses different clocks. Therefore this patch creates a new binding file for this functional block.
Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann msp@baylibre.com
Notes: Changes v3 -> v4: - Fixed clock names in the example as the clock patch series is merged into next now - Add missing ports decleration to the example
Changes v1 -> v2: - Move the devicetree binding from mediatek,dpi into its own binding file..../display/mediatek/mediatek,dpintf.yaml | 86 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpintf.yaml
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring robh@kernel.org
Thanks a lot for reviewing. However I am going to recombine dpintf with dpi as Chun-Kuang helped me realize that the fdp clock is a parent of the pixel clock and therefore not a different clock. In the end the clocks are the same now for both dpi and dpintf, so no need for a separate document.
Best, Markus