On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 07:50:21PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
On previous handling, if specified DRM_MODE_FLAG_N*SYNC, it was ignored, because only PHSYNC and PVSYNC were taken into account. DRM_MODE_FLAG_P*SYNC and DRM_MODE_FLAG_N*SYNC are not exclusive.
If flags contains PVSYNC, it doesn't mean it is NVSYNC. And it's true also the contrary. Also, as I've checked with scope on A20, if (flags & PVSYNC) then SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_VSYNC_POSITIVE must be set, as name suggests. It seems all display io polarities starts inverted if 0.
Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com
PVSYNC and PHSYNC only
Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com
Checkpatch: WARNING: Duplicate signature
drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c index 6121210..e873a37 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c @@ -224,10 +224,10 @@ static void sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_rgb(struct sun4i_tcon *tcon, SUN4I_TCON0_BASIC3_H_SYNC(hsync));
/* Setup the polarity of the various signals */
- if (!(mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_PHSYNC))
- if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_PHSYNC) val |= SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_HSYNC_POSITIVE;
- if (!(mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_PVSYNC))
- if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_PVSYNC) val |= SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_VSYNC_POSITIVE;
I'm not sure why you were talking of the differences between NVSYNC and PVSYNC if you're not making use of any of it here?
Also, how was it tested? This seems quite weird that we haven't caught that one sooner, and I'm a bit worried about the possible regressions here.
Maxime