On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 09:25:29PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:04:18PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
From: Gustavo Padovan gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk
Fold intel_pipe_set_base() in the update primary plane path merging pieces of code that are common to both paths.
Basically the the pin/unpin procedures are the same for both paths and some checks can also be shared (some of the were moved to the check() stage)
v2: take Ville's comments:
- remove unecessary plane check
- move mutex lock to inside the conditional
- make the pin fail message a debug one
- add a fixme for the fastboot hack
- call intel_frontbuffer_flip() after FBC update
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index b78f00a..1a001bf 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -11824,12 +11824,23 @@ intel_check_primary_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_rect *dest = &state->dst; struct drm_rect *src = &state->src; const struct drm_rect *clip = &state->clip;
- int ret;
- return drm_plane_helper_check_update(plane, crtc, fb,
- ret = drm_plane_helper_check_update(plane, crtc, fb, src, dest, clip, DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING, DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING, false, true, &state->visible);
- if (ret)
return ret;
- /* no fb bound */
- if (state->visible && !fb) {
DRM_ERROR("No FB bound\n");
return -EINVAL;
- }
- return 0;
}
static int @@ -11841,14 +11852,34 @@ intel_commit_primary_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev; struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
- enum pipe pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
- struct drm_framebuffer *old_fb = plane->fb; struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = intel_fb_obj(fb); struct drm_i915_gem_object *old_obj = intel_fb_obj(plane->fb); struct intel_plane *intel_plane = to_intel_plane(plane); struct drm_rect *src = &state->src;
- int ret;
int ret = 0;
intel_crtc_wait_for_pending_flips(crtc);
if (intel_crtc_has_pending_flip(crtc)) {
DRM_ERROR("pipe is still busy with an old pageflip\n");
return -EBUSY;
}
if (plane->fb != fb) {
mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
ret = intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj(dev, obj, NULL);
if (ret == 0)
i915_gem_track_fb(old_obj, obj,
INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_PRIMARY(pipe));
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
}
if (ret != 0) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("pin & fence failed\n");
return ret;
}
I'd move this error handling also inside the 'plane->fb != fb' block. That avoids the ret=0 initialization, and more importantly it will match what you did in the sprite code. Thanks to your efforts I'm already dreaming about sharing buffer pinning codes across different plane types...
- /*
- If clipping results in a non-visible primary plane, we'll disable
- the primary plane. Note that this is a bit different than what
@@ -11856,33 +11887,9 @@ intel_commit_primary_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, * because plane->fb still gets set and pinned. */ if (!state->visible) {
mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
/*
* Try to pin the new fb first so that we can bail out if we
* fail.
*/
if (plane->fb != fb) {
ret = intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj(dev, obj, NULL);
if (ret) {
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
return ret;
}
}
i915_gem_track_fb(old_obj, obj,
INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_PRIMARY(intel_crtc->pipe));
if (intel_crtc->primary_enabled) intel_disable_primary_hw_plane(plane, crtc);
if (plane->fb != fb)
if (plane->fb)
intel_unpin_fb_obj(old_obj);
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
} else { if (intel_crtc && intel_crtc->active && intel_crtc->primary_enabled) {
@@ -11902,12 +11909,36 @@ intel_commit_primary_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, intel_disable_fbc(dev); } }
ret = intel_pipe_set_base(crtc, src->x1, src->y1, fb);
if (ret)
return ret;
if (!intel_crtc->primary_enabled)
intel_enable_primary_hw_plane(plane, crtc);
/* FIXME: kill this fastboot hack */
intel_update_pipe_size(intel_crtc);
intel_crtc->primary_enabled = true;
dev_priv->display.update_primary_plane(crtc, fb, src->x1, src->y1);
if (intel_crtc->active)
intel_frontbuffer_flip(dev,
INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_PRIMARY(pipe));
mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
intel_update_fbc(dev);
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
This is still done too early. We need primary->fb to be set before since intel_update_fbc() will consult it to determine if it can now enable fbc.
Hmm. Actaully I think we may want to reorganize this code a bit more so that it more closely resembles the sprite code. So I'm thinking something like this:
crtc->primary->fb = fb; crtc->x = ...; crtc->y = ...;
intel_plane->crtc_x = ...; intel_plane->crtc_y = ...; ...
if (crtc->active) { if (fbc.plane == plane && ...) { disable_fbc();
if (visible) update_pipe_size();
primary_enabled = visible; .update_primary_plane()
Actually better make that if (visible) { update_pipe_size(); intel_enable_primary_hw_plane(); } else { intel_disable_primary_hw_plane(); }
for now so that we we don't have to duplicate the nasty BDW vblank wait workaround when enabling the primary plane.
The next step might be to kill off intel_{enable,disable}_primary_hw_plane() and replace them with intel_primary_plane_setplane() as well, and then we have to move the vblank hack into intel_primary_plane_setplane() itself. But let's do baby steps and get this intel_pipe_set_base() killing finished before we continue too far ahead. Also the sprite plane covering primary plane case probably needs a bit more thought before we can do this.
intel_frontbuffer_flip()
update_fbc(); }
}
crtc->primary->fb = fb;
crtc->x = src->x1;
crtc->y = src->y1;
if (old_fb) {
if (intel_crtc->active && old_fb != fb)
intel_wait_for_vblank(dev, intel_crtc->pipe);
if (old_fb != fb) {
mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
intel_unpin_fb_obj(old_obj);
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
}
}
intel_plane->crtc_x = state->orig_dst.x1;
-- 1.9.3
Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
-- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx