On 10/13/2014 12:16 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
From: Thierry Reding treding@nvidia.com
This panel requires dual-channel mode. The device accepts command-mode data on 8 lanes and will therefore need a dual-channel DSI controller. The two interfaces that make up this device need to be instantiated in the controllers that gang up to provide the dual-channel DSI host.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding treding@nvidia.com
.../bindings/panel/sharp,lq101r1sx01.txt | 46 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig | 13 + drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sharp-lq101r1sx01.c | 426 +++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 486 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/panel/sharp,lq101r1sx01.txt create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sharp-lq101r1sx01.c
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/panel/sharp,lq101r1sx01.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/panel/sharp,lq101r1sx01.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..4ab4380ddac8 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/panel/sharp,lq101r1sx01.txt @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +Sharp Microelectronics 10.1" WQXGA TFT LCD panel
+This panel requires a dual-channel DSI host to operate. It supports two modes: +- left-right: each channel drives the left or right half of the screen +- even-odd: each channel drives the even or odd lines of the screen
+Each of the DSI channels controls a separate DSI peripheral. The peripheral +driven by the first link (DSI-LINK1), left or even, is considered the primary +peripheral and controls the device. The 'link2' property contains a phandle +to the peripheral driven by the second link (DSI-LINK2, right or odd).
+Note that in video mode the DSI-LINK1 interface always provides the left/even +pixels and DSI-LINK2 always provides the right/odd pixels. In command mode it +is possible to program either link to drive the left/even or right/odd pixels +but for the sake of consistency this binding assumes that the same assignment +is chosen as for video mode.
+Required properties: +- compatible: should be "sharp,lq101r1sx01" +- link2: phandle to the DSI peripheral on the secondary link. Note that the
- presence of this property marks the containing node as DSI-LINK1.
+- power-supply: phandle of the regulator that provides the supply voltage
+Optional properties: +- backlight: phandle of the backlight device attached to the panel
+Example:
- dsi@54300000 {
panel: panel@0 {
compatible = "sharp,lq101r1sx01";
reg = <0>;
link2 = <&secondary>;
power-supply = <...>;
backlight = <...>;
};
- };
- dsi@54400000 {
secondary: panel@0 {
compatible = "sharp,lq101r1sx01";
reg = <0>;
};
- };
The example does not follow rules above, 2nd node does not contain required properties. Maybe it should be clearly stated that power-supply, link2 and backlight properties can be present only in LINK1 node; LINK2 node should contain nothing more than compatible and reg.
I guess if it wouldn't be better if different compatibles could be used to distinguish LINK1 and LINK2 nodes, this way you can provide different sets of required/optional properties for both nodes. As a bonus you can have different probe/remove/shutdown callback per link.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig index bee9f72b3a93..024e98ef8e4d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig @@ -27,4 +27,17 @@ config DRM_PANEL_S6E8AA0 select DRM_MIPI_DSI select VIDEOMODE_HELPERS
+config DRM_PANEL_SHARP_LQ101R1SX01
- tristate "Sharp LQ101R1SX01 panel"
- depends on OF
- depends on DRM_MIPI_DSI
- help
Say Y here if you want to enable support for Sharp LQ101R1SX01
TFT-LCD modules. The panel has a 2560x1600 resolution and uses
24 bit RGB per pixel. It provides a dual MIPI DSI interface to
the host and has a built-in LED backlight.
To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
will be called panel-sharp-lq101r1sx01.
endmenu diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile index 8b929212fad7..4b2a0430804b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SIMPLE) += panel-simple.o obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_LD9040) += panel-ld9040.o obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_S6E8AA0) += panel-s6e8aa0.o +obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SHARP_LQ101R1SX01) += panel-sharp-lq101r1sx01.o diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sharp-lq101r1sx01.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sharp-lq101r1sx01.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..09356697d22f --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sharp-lq101r1sx01.c @@ -0,0 +1,426 @@ +/*
- Copyright (C) 2014 NVIDIA Corporation
- This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
- it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
- published by the Free Software Foundation.
- */
+#include <linux/backlight.h> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
+#include <drm/drmP.h> +#include <drm/drm_crtc.h> +#include <drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h> +#include <drm/drm_panel.h>
+#include <video/mipi_display.h>
+#include <linux/host1x.h>
+struct sharp_panel {
- struct drm_panel base;
- /* the datasheet refers to them as DSI-LINK1 and DSI-LINK2 */
- struct mipi_dsi_device *link1;
- struct mipi_dsi_device *link2;
- struct backlight_device *backlight;
- struct regulator *supply;
- bool prepared;
- bool enabled;
- const struct drm_display_mode *mode;
+};
+static inline struct sharp_panel *to_sharp_panel(struct drm_panel *panel) +{
- return container_of(panel, struct sharp_panel, base);
+}
+static int sharp_panel_write(struct sharp_panel *sharp, u16 offset, u8 value) +{
- u8 payload[3] = { offset >> 8, offset & 0xff, value };
- struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = sharp->link1;
- ssize_t err;
- err = mipi_dsi_generic_write(dsi, payload, sizeof(payload));
- if (err < 0)
dev_err(&dsi->dev, "failed to write %02x to %04x: %d\n",
value, offset, err);
- err = mipi_dsi_dcs_nop(dsi);
- if (err < 0)
dev_err(&dsi->dev, "failed to send DCS nop: %d\n", err);
If mipi_dsi_generic_write fails and mipi_dsi_dcs_nop succeeds function return success, is it OK?
- usleep_range(10, 20);
- return err;
+}
+static __maybe_unused int sharp_panel_read(struct sharp_panel *sharp,
u16 offset, u8 *value)
+{
- ssize_t err;
- cpu_to_be16s(&offset);
- err = mipi_dsi_generic_read(sharp->link1, &offset, sizeof(offset),
value, sizeof(*value));
- if (err < 0)
dev_err(&sharp->link1->dev, "failed to read from %04x: %d\n",
offset, err);
- return err;
+}
+static int sharp_panel_disable(struct drm_panel *panel) +{
- struct sharp_panel *sharp = to_sharp_panel(panel);
- if (!sharp->enabled)
return 0;
Shouldn't we assume disable callback can be called only on enabled panel?
- if (sharp->backlight) {
sharp->backlight->props.power = FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN;
backlight_update_status(sharp->backlight);
- }
- sharp->enabled = false;
- return 0;
+}
+static int sharp_panel_unprepare(struct drm_panel *panel) +{
- struct sharp_panel *sharp = to_sharp_panel(panel);
- int err;
- if (!sharp->prepared)
return 0;
Shouldn't we assume unprepare callback can be called only on enabled panel?
- err = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_off(sharp->link1);
- if (err < 0)
dev_err(panel->dev, "failed to set display off: %d\n", err);
- err = mipi_dsi_dcs_enter_sleep_mode(sharp->link1);
- if (err < 0)
dev_err(panel->dev, "failed to enter sleep mode: %d\n", err);
- msleep(120);
- regulator_disable(sharp->supply);
- sharp->prepared = false;
- return 0;
+}
+static int sharp_setup_symmetrical_split(struct mipi_dsi_device *left,
struct mipi_dsi_device *right,
const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
+{
- int err;
- err = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_column_address(left, 0, mode->hdisplay / 2 - 1);
- if (err < 0)
dev_err(&left->dev, "failed to set column address: %d\n", err);
- err = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_page_address(left, 0, mode->vdisplay - 1);
- if (err < 0)
dev_err(&left->dev, "failed to set page address: %d\n", err);
- err = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_column_address(right, mode->hdisplay / 2,
mode->hdisplay - 1);
- if (err < 0)
dev_err(&right->dev, "failed to set column address: %d\n", err);
- err = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_page_address(right, 0, mode->vdisplay - 1);
- if (err < 0)
dev_err(&right->dev, "failed to set page address: %d\n", err);
- return 0;
It always returns 0, maybe it could be void?
+}
+static int sharp_panel_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel) +{
- struct sharp_panel *sharp = to_sharp_panel(panel);
- u8 format = MIPI_DCS_PIXEL_FMT_24BIT;
- int err;
- if (sharp->prepared)
return 0;
- err = regulator_enable(sharp->supply);
- if (err < 0)
return err;
- usleep_range(10000, 20000);
- err = mipi_dsi_dcs_soft_reset(sharp->link1);
- if (err < 0)
dev_err(panel->dev, "soft reset failed: %d\n", err);
- msleep(120);
- err = mipi_dsi_dcs_exit_sleep_mode(sharp->link1);
- if (err < 0)
dev_err(panel->dev, "failed to exit sleep mode: %d\n", err);
- /*
* The MIPI DCS specification mandates this delay only between the
* exit_sleep_mode and enter_sleep_mode commands, so it isn't strictly
* necessary here.
*/
- /*
- msleep(120);
- */
- /* set left-right mode */
- err = sharp_panel_write(sharp, 0x1000, 0x2a);
- if (err < 0)
dev_err(panel->dev, "failed to set left-right mode: %d\n", err);
- /* enable command mode */
- err = sharp_panel_write(sharp, 0x1001, 0x01);
- if (err < 0)
dev_err(panel->dev, "failed to enable command mode: %d\n", err);
- err = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_pixel_format(sharp->link1, format);
- if (err < 0)
dev_err(panel->dev, "failed to set pixel format: %d\n", err);
- /*
* TODO: The device supports both left-right and even-odd split
* configurations, but this driver currently supports only the left-
* right split. To support a different mode a mechanism needs to be
* put in place to communicate the configuration back to the DSI host
* controller.
*/
- err = sharp_setup_symmetrical_split(sharp->link1, sharp->link2,
sharp->mode);
- if (err < 0)
dev_err(panel->dev, "failed to set up symmetrical split: %d\n",
err);
- err = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_on(sharp->link1);
- if (err < 0)
dev_err(panel->dev, "failed to set display on: %d\n", err);
- sharp->prepared = true;
- return err;
You should return 0 here, or if you want to signal error to caller you should unwind changes, I guess regulator_disable should be enough.
+}
+static int sharp_panel_enable(struct drm_panel *panel) +{
- struct sharp_panel *sharp = to_sharp_panel(panel);
- if (sharp->enabled)
return 0;
- if (sharp->backlight) {
sharp->backlight->props.power = FB_BLANK_UNBLANK;
backlight_update_status(sharp->backlight);
- }
- sharp->enabled = true;
- return 0;
+}
+static const struct drm_display_mode default_mode = {
- .clock = 278000,
- .hdisplay = 2560,
- .hsync_start = 2560 + 128,
- .hsync_end = 2560 + 128 + 64,
- .htotal = 2560 + 128 + 64 + 64,
- .vdisplay = 1600,
- .vsync_start = 1600 + 4,
- .vsync_end = 1600 + 4 + 8,
- .vtotal = 1600 + 4 + 8 + 32,
- .vrefresh = 60,
+};
+static int sharp_panel_get_modes(struct drm_panel *panel) +{
- struct drm_display_mode *mode;
- mode = drm_mode_duplicate(panel->drm, &default_mode);
- if (!mode) {
dev_err(panel->drm->dev, "failed to add mode %ux%ux@%u\n",
default_mode.hdisplay, default_mode.vdisplay,
default_mode.vrefresh);
return -ENOMEM;
- }
- drm_mode_set_name(mode);
- drm_mode_probed_add(panel->connector, mode);
- panel->connector->display_info.width_mm = 217;
- panel->connector->display_info.height_mm = 136;
- return 1;
+}
+static const struct drm_panel_funcs sharp_panel_funcs = {
- .disable = sharp_panel_disable,
- .unprepare = sharp_panel_unprepare,
- .prepare = sharp_panel_prepare,
- .enable = sharp_panel_enable,
- .get_modes = sharp_panel_get_modes,
+};
+static const struct of_device_id sharp_of_match[] = {
- { .compatible = "sharp,lq101r1sx01", },
- { }
+}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sharp_of_match);
+static int sharp_panel_add(struct sharp_panel *sharp) +{
- struct device_node *np;
- int err;
- sharp->mode = &default_mode;
- sharp->supply = devm_regulator_get(&sharp->link1->dev, "power");
- if (IS_ERR(sharp->supply))
return PTR_ERR(sharp->supply);
- np = of_parse_phandle(sharp->link1->dev.of_node, "backlight", 0);
- if (np) {
sharp->backlight = of_find_backlight_by_node(np);
of_node_put(np);
if (!sharp->backlight)
return -EPROBE_DEFER;
- }
- drm_panel_init(&sharp->base);
- sharp->base.funcs = &sharp_panel_funcs;
- sharp->base.dev = &sharp->link1->dev;
- err = drm_panel_add(&sharp->base);
- if (err < 0)
goto put_backlight;
- return 0;
+put_backlight:
- if (sharp->backlight)
put_device(&sharp->backlight->dev);
- return err;
+}
+static void sharp_panel_del(struct sharp_panel *sharp) +{
- if (sharp->base.dev)
drm_panel_remove(&sharp->base);
- if (sharp->backlight)
put_device(&sharp->backlight->dev);
+}
+static int sharp_panel_probe(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi) +{
- struct mipi_dsi_device *secondary = NULL;
- struct sharp_panel *sharp;
- struct device_node *np;
- int err;
- dsi->lanes = 4;
- dsi->format = MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB888;
- dsi->mode_flags = 0;
- /* Find DSI-LINK1 */
- np = of_parse_phandle(dsi->dev.of_node, "link2", 0);
- if (np) {
secondary = of_find_mipi_dsi_device_by_node(np);
of_node_put(np);
if (!secondary)
return -EPROBE_DEFER;
- }
- sharp = devm_kzalloc(&dsi->dev, sizeof(*sharp), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!sharp)
return -ENOMEM;
Do we really need this for LINK2 device? You can just check if mipi_dsi_get_drvdata is not null to distinguish them, I suppose.
- mipi_dsi_set_drvdata(dsi, sharp);
- /* register a panel for only the DSI-LINK1 interface */
- if (secondary) {
sharp->link2 = secondary;
sharp->link1 = dsi;
err = sharp_panel_add(sharp);
if (err < 0)
return err;
- }
- err = mipi_dsi_attach(dsi);
- if (err < 0) {
sharp_panel_del(sharp);
return err;
- }
- return 0;
+}
+static int sharp_panel_remove(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi) +{
- struct sharp_panel *sharp = mipi_dsi_get_drvdata(dsi);
- int err;
- /* only detach from host for the DSI-LINK2 interface */
- if (!sharp->link2) {
mipi_dsi_detach(dsi);
There is no locking mechanism here, so it is possible that everything can crash if someone unbind driver from LINK2 and then try to enable the panel.
return 0;
- }
- err = sharp_panel_disable(&sharp->base);
- if (err < 0)
dev_err(&dsi->dev, "failed to disable panel: %d\n", err);
IMHO calling mipi_dsi_detach below should cause connector to call panel disable and unprepare so the call above seems to me unnecessary.
- err = mipi_dsi_detach(dsi);
- if (err < 0)
dev_err(&dsi->dev, "failed to detach from DSI host: %d\n", err);
- drm_panel_detach(&sharp->base);
drm_panel_attach is called from tegra_dsi_host_attach, wouldn't be more 'symmetrical' to call drm_panel_detach from tegra_dsi_host_detach :)
Regards Andrzej
- drm_panel_remove(&sharp->base);
- if (sharp->backlight)
put_device(&sharp->backlight->dev);
- put_device(&sharp->link2->dev);
- return 0;
+}
+static void sharp_panel_shutdown(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi) +{
- struct sharp_panel *sharp = mipi_dsi_get_drvdata(dsi);
- sharp_panel_disable(&sharp->base);
+}
+static struct mipi_dsi_driver sharp_panel_driver = {
- .driver = {
.name = "panel-sharp-lq101r1sx01",
.of_match_table = sharp_of_match,
- },
- .probe = sharp_panel_probe,
- .remove = sharp_panel_remove,
- .shutdown = sharp_panel_shutdown,
+}; +module_mipi_dsi_driver(sharp_panel_driver);
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Thierry Reding treding@nvidia.com"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Sharp LQ101R1SX01 panel driver"); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");