On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 04:37:03PM -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
For PSR2 there is no register to tell HW to keep main link enabled while PSR2 is active, so don't configure sink DPCD with a misleading value.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com Cc: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.vivi@intel.com Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza jose.souza@intel.com
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c index f5d27a02eb28..888e348cc1b4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c @@ -391,12 +391,14 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_RECEIVER_ALPM_CONFIG, DP_ALPM_ENABLE); dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_ENABLE_PSR2;
- } else {
if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby)
dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE;
if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8)
dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION;
commit message only mention the link stand-by... could you please do this in a separated patch?
}
if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby)
dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE;
if (!dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8)
dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION;
drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG, dpcd_val);
drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SET_POWER, DP_SET_POWER_D0);
-- 2.19.2