On 06/08/17 12:42 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
Michel Dänzer michel@daenzer.net writes:
[...]
+#define DRM_CRTC_SEQUENCE_NEXT_ON_MISS 0x00000002 /* Use next sequence if we've missed */
Do you have userspace making use of DRM_CRTC_SEQUENCE_NEXT_ON_MISS? If not, drop it.
I added this so that the new ioctl would be compatible with the old ioctl; do you think that's unnecessary?
I do. I don't know if there's ever been any real-world usage of DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS. Let's not repeat my mistake in the new interface.