On 10/05/2020 17:55, Clément Péron wrote:
This use devfreq variable that will be lock with spinlock in future patches. We should either introduce a function to access this one but as devfreq is optional let's just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Clément Péron peron.clem@gmail.com
As far as I can tell this should be safe. As you note this wouldn't work without devfreq anyway.
Reviewed-by: Steven Price steven.price@arm.com
drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c index 7914b1570841..63e32a9f2749 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c @@ -581,10 +581,6 @@ int panfrost_job_is_idle(struct panfrost_device *pfdev) struct panfrost_job_slot *js = pfdev->js; int i;
- /* Check whether the hardware is idle */
- if (atomic_read(&pfdev->devfreq.busy_count))
return false;- for (i = 0; i < NUM_JOB_SLOTS; i++) { /* If there are any jobs in the HW queue, we're not idle */ if (atomic_read(&js->queue[i].sched.hw_rq_count))