Hi
Am 21.06.22 um 11:38 schrieb David Gow:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:06 AM José Expósito jose.exposito89@gmail.com wrote:
Add a helper macro to initialize a rectangle from x, y, width and height information.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula jani.nikula@intel.com Acked-by: Thomas Zimmermann tzimmermann@suse.de Signed-off-by: José Expósito jose.exposito89@gmail.com
This looks good to me, though I have one minor concern about the macro name. (But if it's okay with the DRM folks, which it seems to be, I won't object.)
Either way, Reviewed-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
include/drm/drm_rect.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_rect.h b/include/drm/drm_rect.h index 6f6e19bd4dac..e8d94fca2703 100644 --- a/include/drm/drm_rect.h +++ b/include/drm/drm_rect.h @@ -47,6 +47,22 @@ struct drm_rect { int x1, y1, x2, y2; };
+/**
- DRM_RECT_INIT - initialize a rectangle from x/y/w/h
- @x: x coordinate
- @y: y coordinate
- @w: width
- @h: height
- RETURNS:
- A new rectangle of the specified size.
- */
+#define DRM_RECT_INIT(x, y, w, h) ((struct drm_rect){ \
.x1 = (x), \.y1 = (y), \.x2 = (x) + (w), \.y2 = (y) + (h) })My only slight concern here is that it might be a little bit confusing that a macro called DRM_RECT_INIT() accepts x/y/w/h, whereas the actual struct drm_rect is x1/y1/x2/y2. If the macro were called something like DRM_RECT_INIT_FROM_XYWH() or similar.
The existing drm_rect_init() function uses xywh arguments. So the current name is consistent with existing practice. I don't think we refer to x2,y2 much, if ever.
Best regards Thomas
/**
- DRM_RECT_FMT - printf string for &struct drm_rect
*/
2.25.1