Hi Maxime,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 03:35:03PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Following the previous patch, let's introduce a generic panel-lvds binding that documents the panels that don't have any particular constraint documented.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard maxime@cerno.tech
.../bindings/display/panel/panel-lvds.yaml | 56 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-lvds.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-lvds.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-lvds.yaml new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..f6ce8e29391e --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-lvds.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/panel/panel-lvds.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+title: Generic LVDS Display Panel Device Tree Bindings
+maintainers:
- Lad Prabhakar prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com
- Thierry Reding thierry.reding@gmail.com
+allOf:
- $ref: panel-common.yaml#
- $ref: lvds.yaml#
+select:
- properties:
- compatible:
contains:const: panel-lvds- not:
- properties:
compatible:contains:enum:- advantech,idk-1110wr- innolux,ee101ia-01d- mitsubishi,aa104xd12- mitsubishi,aa121td01- sgd,gktw70sdae4se
This will be annoying to maintain, I'm pretty sure authors will forget to update this file when adding bindings for other panels. Is there any way we could select this binding with a positive rule instead of a negative rule ?
- required:
- compatible
+properties:
- compatible:
- items:
- enum:- auo,b101ew05- tbs,a711-panel- const: panel-lvds+unevaluatedProperties: false
+required:
- compatible
- data-mapping
- width-mm
- height-mm
- panel-timing
- port
+...