On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 06:35:25PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
The MIPI DSI PHY controller on Allwinner R40 is similar on the one on A31.
Add R40 compatible and append A31 compatible as fallback.
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki jagan@amarulasolutions.com
Changes for v3:
- update the binding in new yaml format
.../devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml index 8841938050b2..0c283fe79402 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ properties: oneOf: - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy - items:
- const: allwinner,sun8i-r40-mipi-dphy - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64-mipi-dphy - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy
This isn't doing what you say it does.
Here you're stating that there's two valid values, one that is a single element allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy, and another which is a list of three elements allwinner,sun8i-r40-mipi-dphy, allwinner,sun50i-a64-mipi-dphy and allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy, in that order.
Did you run make dtbs_check and dt_bindings_check?
Maxime