27 Aug
2015
27 Aug
'15
7:53 p.m.
On 08/27/2015 09:06 AM, Hwang, Dongseong wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 2:29 AM, Tiago Vignatti
+#define DMA_BUF_BASE 'b'
'b' is occupied by vme and qat driver; https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-numb...
I believe this is alright, as noted in that txt file: "Because of the large number of drivers, many drivers share a partial letter with other drivers".
is it bad idea for drm.h to include these definition? http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/include/uapi/drm/drm.h#L684
this is not a drm code and other type of device drivers might want to use it as well.
Tiago