On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 07:26:55PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 03:41:14PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: ...
- seq_printf(m, "\t\tuapi: [FB:%d] ", fb ? fb->base.id : 0);
- if (fb)
seq_printf(m, "%p4cc", &fb->format->format);
- else
seq_puts(m, "n/a");
- seq_printf(m, ",0x%llx,%dx%d, visible=%s, src=" DRM_RECT_FP_FMT ", dst=" DRM_RECT_FMT ", rotation=%s\n",
Why not to keep two seq_printf() calls?
if (fb) { seq_printf(); } else { seq_printf(); }
?
I could, but it'd repeat a lot of the same format string that is very complicated right now. Therefore I thought it's better to split.
It's fine, why not?
Or do you mean seq_printf() vs. seq_puts()? checkpatch.pl (rightly) warns about it.
If it doesn't take run-time parameters, then definitely if (fb) seq_printf(); else seq_puts();
fb ? fb->modifier : 0, fb ? fb->width : 0, fb ? fb->height : 0, plane_visibility(plane_state),