From: Rob Clark rob@ti.com
Otherwise subsystems will get this wrong and end up with a second export ioctl with the flag and O_CLOEXEC support added.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark rob@ti.com Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch --- Updated version of Daniel's original documentation patch with (hopefully) improved wording, and a better description of the motivation.
Documentation/dma-buf-sharing.txt | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/dma-buf-sharing.txt b/Documentation/dma-buf-sharing.txt index 225f96d..3b51134 100644 --- a/Documentation/dma-buf-sharing.txt +++ b/Documentation/dma-buf-sharing.txt @@ -223,6 +223,24 @@ Miscellaneous notes: - Any exporters or users of the dma-buf buffer sharing framework must have a 'select DMA_SHARED_BUFFER' in their respective Kconfigs.
+- In order to avoid fd leaks on exec, the FD_CLOEXEC flag must be set + on the file descriptor. This is not just a resource leak, but a + potential security hole. It could give the newly exec'd application + access to buffers, via the leaked fd, to which it should otherwise + not be permitted access. + + The problem with doing this via a separate fcntl() call, versus doing it + atomically when the fd is created, is that this is inherently racy in a + multi-threaded app[3]. The issue is made worse when it is library code + opening/creating the file descriptor, as the application may not even be + aware of the fd's. + + To avoid this problem, userspace must have a way to request O_CLOEXEC + flag be set when the dma-buf fd is created. So any API provided by + the exporting driver to create a dmabuf fd must provide a way to let + userspace control setting of O_CLOEXEC flag passed in to dma_buf_fd(). + References: [1] struct dma_buf_ops in include/linux/dma-buf.h [2] All interfaces mentioned above defined in include/linux/dma-buf.h +[3] https://lwn.net/Articles/236486/