Hi Thierry
When I'm preparing v3 series, I meet some trobules from your comment, wish you could give some advise? ;)
在 2015/8/10 18:00, Thierry Reding 写道:
On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 11:54:38AM +0800, Yakir Yang wrote: [...]
edp: edp@ff970000 {
[...]
samsung,color-space = <0>; samsung,dynamic-range = <0>; samsung,ycbcr-coeff = <0>;
I think these should also come from EDID, though I'm not sure if we store this in internal data structures yet.
samsung,color-depth = <1>;
This is probably drm_display_info.bpc.
"samsung,color_space" and "samsung,color-depth"
The drm_display_info's color_formats and bpc indicate the monitor display ability, but the edp driver could not take it as input video format directly.
For example, with my DP TV I would found "RGB444 & YCRCB422 & & YCRCB444" support in drm_display_info.color_formats and 16bit bpc support, but RK3288 crtc driver could only output RGB & ITU formats, so finally analogix_dp-rockchip driver config crtc to RGBaaa 10bpc mode.
In this sutiation, the analogix_dp core driver would pazzled by the drm_display_info, can't chose the right color_space and bpc.
And this is the place that confused me, wish you could give some ideas about this one :-) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Besides, The dynamic_range and ycbcr_coeff haven't been record in drm_display_info, but I though we can parse it by the video code.
The dynamic_range would have two values "CEA range" and "VESA range", so I though if the currect mode have a no-zero vic (drm_match_cea_mode()) then config it to "CEA range", otherwhise config it to "VESA range".
YCbCr Coefficients would have two values "ITU709" and "ITU601". I see dw_hdmi driver have been set the colorimetry to ITU_601 when vic is 6/7/21/22/2/3/17/18, I thouht we can stole this to analogix_dp driver.
/* dynamic_range & colorimetry */ vic = drm_match_cea_mode(mode); if ((vic == 6) || (vic == 7) || (vic == 21) || (vic == 22) || (vic == 2) || (vic == 3) || (vic == 17) || (vic == 18)) { video_info->dynamic_range = CEA; video_info->ycbcr_coeff = COLOR_YCBCR601; } else if (vic) { video_info->dynamic_range = CEA; video_info->ycbcr_coeff = COLOR_YCBCR709; } else { video_info->dynamic_range = VESA; video_info->ycbcr_coeff = COLOR_YCBCR709; }
I'm not sure whether this is right, also wish you could give some suggests ;)
samsung,link-rate = <0x0a>; samsung,lane-count = <1>;
And these should really be derived from values in the DPCD and adjusted (if necessary) during link training.
Why would you ever want to hard-code the above?
And I though we should keep those DT properties now. I try to remove those DT property, so analogix dp driver would always use the max link_rate and lane_count which read from dpcd. For my 2K DP TV, link rate would reach to 5.4Gbps, lane cout would reach 4 lances, if so analogix dp driver could not light my DP TV up any more.
After that I found that RK3288 eDP TRM have indicated some limites about those that RK3288 only support 4 physical lanes of 2.7/1.62 Gbps/lane, which means 5.4Gbps link rate is too high for RK3288.
So I think we could treate them as hardware max values, is it okay?
Thanks, - Yakir