Hi,
These patches adds MAINTAINERS entries for DRM panel and encoder drivers and DSI bus I have written.
Regards Andrzej
Andrzej Hajda (5): MAINTAINERS: Add entry for MIPI DSI bus MAINTAINERS: Add entry for LD9040 drm panel driver MAINTAINERS: Add entry for S6E8AA0 drm panel driver MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Exynos MIPI DSI DRM driver MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Exynos MIPI DPI DRM driver
MAINTAINERS | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda a.hajda@samsung.com --- MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index dd31933..476679c 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -3071,6 +3071,13 @@ F: drivers/gpu/vga/ F: include/drm/ F: include/uapi/drm/
+DRM MIPI DSI BUS +M: Andrzej Hajda a.hajda@samsung.com +L: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org +S: Supported +F: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c +F: include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h + RADEON DRM DRIVERS M: Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com M: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:48:26AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda a.hajda@samsung.com
MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index dd31933..476679c 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -3071,6 +3071,13 @@ F: drivers/gpu/vga/ F: include/drm/ F: include/uapi/drm/
+DRM MIPI DSI BUS +M: Andrzej Hajda a.hajda@samsung.com +L: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org +S: Supported +F: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c +F: include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
I really prefer when common infrastructure like this doesn't get maintainer by a vendor. And I care with my intel hat on since we also ahve a dsi driver that sooner or later needs to be converted to to this stuff.
Why doesn't the usual model of merging stuff through Dave's tree, or if that doesn't work well due to patch depencies, through vendor trees with Dave's ack?
Thanks, Daniel
RADEON DRM DRIVERS M: Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com M: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com -- 1.9.1
dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
On 10/27/2014 03:17 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:48:26AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda a.hajda@samsung.com
MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index dd31933..476679c 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -3071,6 +3071,13 @@ F: drivers/gpu/vga/ F: include/drm/ F: include/uapi/drm/
+DRM MIPI DSI BUS +M: Andrzej Hajda a.hajda@samsung.com +L: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org +S: Supported +F: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c +F: include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
I really prefer when common infrastructure like this doesn't get maintainer by a vendor. And I care with my intel hat on since we also ahve a dsi driver that sooner or later needs to be converted to to this stuff.
Why doesn't the usual model of merging stuff through Dave's tree, or if that doesn't work well due to patch depencies, through vendor trees with Dave's ack?
The main intention of this patch is to be on CC in case of patches touching MIPI DSI bus. I do not want to create separate tree for such small subsystem.
So if such things are not allowed please drop the patch and sorry for the noise.
Regards Andrzej
Thanks, Daniel
RADEON DRM DRIVERS M: Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com M: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com -- 1.9.1
dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 04:20:21PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
On 10/27/2014 03:17 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:48:26AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda a.hajda@samsung.com
MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index dd31933..476679c 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -3071,6 +3071,13 @@ F: drivers/gpu/vga/ F: include/drm/ F: include/uapi/drm/
+DRM MIPI DSI BUS +M: Andrzej Hajda a.hajda@samsung.com +L: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org +S: Supported +F: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c +F: include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
I really prefer when common infrastructure like this doesn't get maintainer by a vendor. And I care with my intel hat on since we also ahve a dsi driver that sooner or later needs to be converted to to this stuff.
Why doesn't the usual model of merging stuff through Dave's tree, or if that doesn't work well due to patch depencies, through vendor trees with Dave's ack?
The main intention of this patch is to be on CC in case of patches touching MIPI DSI bus. I do not want to create separate tree for such small subsystem.
So if such things are not allowed please drop the patch and sorry for the noise.
For that stuff you can just create a mail filter that shovels everything touching anything dsi related on dri-devel (people arleady should send all stuff there anyway) into a special folder/mark it as important. If you rely on people to always use get_maintainers.pl that won't work properly anyway.
So if all you want is to notice all dsi related patches then adding a maintainer entry isn't a good solution anyway. So best to drop this one. -Daniel
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 03:17:17PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:48:26AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda a.hajda@samsung.com
MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index dd31933..476679c 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -3071,6 +3071,13 @@ F: drivers/gpu/vga/ F: include/drm/ F: include/uapi/drm/
+DRM MIPI DSI BUS +M: Andrzej Hajda a.hajda@samsung.com +L: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org +S: Supported +F: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c +F: include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
I really prefer when common infrastructure like this doesn't get maintainer by a vendor. And I care with my intel hat on since we also ahve a dsi driver that sooner or later needs to be converted to to this stuff.
Why doesn't the usual model of merging stuff through Dave's tree, or if that doesn't work well due to patch depencies, through vendor trees with Dave's ack?
FWIW, I've merged DSI changes through the panel tree in the past after discussing it with Dave on IRC. It seemed like a good fit and it was most relevant for panels anyway. Given that I had expected that Dave would give it a closer look before pulling than any of the vendor trees anyway, so it would be as good as an explicit Acked-by anyway.
Thierry
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda a.hajda@samsung.com --- MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 476679c..6e57cad 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -3097,6 +3097,13 @@ F: drivers/gpu/drm/panel/ F: include/drm/drm_panel.h F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/panel/
+DRM PANEL LD9040 DRIVER +M: Andrzej Hajda a.hajda@samsung.com +L: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org +S: Supported +F: drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ld9040.c +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/panel/samsung,ld9040.txt + INTEL DRM DRIVERS (excluding Poulsbo, Moorestown and derivative chipsets) M: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@intel.com M: Jani Nikula jani.nikula@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda a.hajda@samsung.com --- MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 6e57cad..2546fca 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -3104,6 +3104,13 @@ S: Supported F: drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ld9040.c F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/panel/samsung,ld9040.txt
+DRM PANEL S6E8AA0 DRIVER +M: Andrzej Hajda a.hajda@samsung.com +L: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org +S: Supported +F: drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-s6e8aa0.c +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/panel/samsung,s6e8aa0.txt + INTEL DRM DRIVERS (excluding Poulsbo, Moorestown and derivative chipsets) M: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@intel.com M: Jani Nikula jani.nikula@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda a.hajda@samsung.com --- MAINTAINERS | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 2546fca..256183e 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -3650,6 +3650,12 @@ S: Maintained F: drivers/video/fbdev/exynos/exynos_mipi* F: include/video/exynos_mipi*
+EXYNOS MIPI DSI DRM DRIVER +M: Andrzej Hajda a.hajda@samsung.com +L: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org +S: Supported +F: drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c + F71805F HARDWARE MONITORING DRIVER M: Jean Delvare jdelvare@suse.de L: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda a.hajda@samsung.com --- MAINTAINERS | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 256183e..06cdb5a 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -3656,6 +3656,12 @@ L: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org S: Supported F: drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
+EXYNOS MIPI DPI DRM DRIVER +M: Andrzej Hajda a.hajda@samsung.com +L: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org +S: Supported +F: drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dpi.c + F71805F HARDWARE MONITORING DRIVER M: Jean Delvare jdelvare@suse.de L: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
-
Andrzej Hajda -
Daniel Vetter -
Thierry Reding