From: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com
reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu() should enable signaling even with a zero timeout, but ttm_bo_wait() can also be called from atomic context and then it is not a good idea to do this.
Fixes "reservation: revert "wait only with non-zero timeout specified (v3)"".
Signed-off-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c index 608c585..478d563 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c @@ -1605,7 +1605,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_unmap_virtual); int ttm_bo_wait(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool interruptible, bool no_wait) { - long timeout = no_wait ? 0 : 15 * HZ; + long timeout = 15 * HZ; + + if (no_wait) { + if (reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(bo->resv, true)) + return 0; + else + return -EBUSY; + }
timeout = reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(bo->resv, true, interruptible, timeout);
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org