Hi all,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced these warnings:
Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst:2412: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem:1393. Declaration is '.. c:enum:: drm_i915_gem_memory_class'. Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst:2484: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem:2484. Declaration is '.. c:struct:: drm_i915_gem_memory_class_instance'. Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst:7: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem:7. Declaration is '.. c:struct:: drm_i915_memory_region_info'. Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst:2531: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem:2531. Declaration is '.. c:struct:: drm_i915_query_memory_regions'. Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst:2595: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem:1393. Declaration is '.. c:struct:: drm_i915_gem_create_ext'. Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst:2615: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem:1393. Declaration is '.. c:struct:: drm_i915_gem_create_ext_memory_regions'.
Introduced by (one or more of) commits
0c1a77cbdafb ("drm/doc: add section for driver uAPI") 2bc9c04ea702 ("drm/doc/rfc: i915 DG1 uAPI") 727ecd99a4c9 ("drm/doc/rfc: drop the i915_gem_lmem.h header")
Hi all,
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 19:32:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced these warnings:
Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst:2412: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem:1393. Declaration is '.. c:enum:: drm_i915_gem_memory_class'. Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst:2484: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem:2484. Declaration is '.. c:struct:: drm_i915_gem_memory_class_instance'. Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst:7: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem:7. Declaration is '.. c:struct:: drm_i915_memory_region_info'. Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst:2531: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem:2531. Declaration is '.. c:struct:: drm_i915_query_memory_regions'. Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst:2595: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem:1393. Declaration is '.. c:struct:: drm_i915_gem_create_ext'. Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst:2615: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem:1393. Declaration is '.. c:struct:: drm_i915_gem_create_ext_memory_regions'.
Introduced by (one or more of) commits
0c1a77cbdafb ("drm/doc: add section for driver uAPI") 2bc9c04ea702 ("drm/doc/rfc: i915 DG1 uAPI") 727ecd99a4c9 ("drm/doc/rfc: drop the i915_gem_lmem.h header")
I am still getting these warning.
Hi all,
On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 12:20:48 +1000 Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 19:32:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced these warnings:
Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst:2412: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem:1393. Declaration is '.. c:enum:: drm_i915_gem_memory_class'. Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst:2484: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem:2484. Declaration is '.. c:struct:: drm_i915_gem_memory_class_instance'. Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst:7: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem:7. Declaration is '.. c:struct:: drm_i915_memory_region_info'. Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst:2531: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem:2531. Declaration is '.. c:struct:: drm_i915_query_memory_regions'. Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst:2595: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem:1393. Declaration is '.. c:struct:: drm_i915_gem_create_ext'. Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst:2615: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem:1393. Declaration is '.. c:struct:: drm_i915_gem_create_ext_memory_regions'.
Introduced by (one or more of) commits
0c1a77cbdafb ("drm/doc: add section for driver uAPI") 2bc9c04ea702 ("drm/doc/rfc: i915 DG1 uAPI") 727ecd99a4c9 ("drm/doc/rfc: drop the i915_gem_lmem.h header")
I am still getting these warning.
Still getting them ...
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 07:26:36PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 12:20:48 +1000 Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 19:32:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced these warnings:
Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst:2412: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem:1393. Declaration is '.. c:enum:: drm_i915_gem_memory_class'. Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst:2484: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem:2484. Declaration is '.. c:struct:: drm_i915_gem_memory_class_instance'. Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst:7: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem:7. Declaration is '.. c:struct:: drm_i915_memory_region_info'. Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst:2531: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem:2531. Declaration is '.. c:struct:: drm_i915_query_memory_regions'. Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst:2595: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem:1393. Declaration is '.. c:struct:: drm_i915_gem_create_ext'. Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst:2615: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem:1393. Declaration is '.. c:struct:: drm_i915_gem_create_ext_memory_regions'.
Introduced by (one or more of) commits
0c1a77cbdafb ("drm/doc: add section for driver uAPI") 2bc9c04ea702 ("drm/doc/rfc: i915 DG1 uAPI") 727ecd99a4c9 ("drm/doc/rfc: drop the i915_gem_lmem.h header")
I am still getting these warning.
Still getting them ...
Matt Auld is on vacation, and the other issue is that the tree where this is from isn't in linux-next. So will take a bit to get sorted in linux-next. -Daniel
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:14:38 +0200 Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch wrote:
Matt Auld is on vacation, and the other issue is that the tree where this is from isn't in linux-next. So will take a bit to get sorted in linux-next.
Those warnings are now coming from Linus' tree (some time before v5.14-rc1). I first mentioned them on June 3.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 08:38:59PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:14:38 +0200 Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch wrote:
Matt Auld is on vacation, and the other issue is that the tree where this is from isn't in linux-next. So will take a bit to get sorted in linux-next.
Those warnings are now coming from Linus' tree (some time before v5.14-rc1). I first mentioned them on June 3.
Uh that's not good, I missed that. I'll look into it. -Daniel
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:50:55 +0200 Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch wrote:
Uh that's not good, I missed that. I'll look into it.
Thanks.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 1:01 PM Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:50:55 +0200 Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch wrote:
Uh that's not good, I missed that. I'll look into it.
Thanks.
Doc build is taking absolutely forever here, but I think I have the right patch for you. t-b/ack would be great if you can give it a spin, I cc'ed you. -Daniel
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 14:39:17 +0200 Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 1:01 PM Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:50:55 +0200 Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch wrote:
Uh that's not good, I missed that. I'll look into it.
Thanks.
Doc build is taking absolutely forever here, but I think I have the right patch for you. t-b/ack would be great if you can give it a spin, I cc'ed you.
Tested-by Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
Thanks. And, yes, the doc build takes quite some time :-(
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org