Exynos DSI DRM driver uses private calls to out bridge to force certain order of operations during init/exit sequences. This no longer works after conversion of bridge chain to a double-linked list. To fix the regression call bridge related operations manually instead of the generic drm_bridge_chain_*() operations.
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski m.szyprowski@samsung.com Fixes: 05193dc38197 ("drm/bridge: Make the bridge chain a double-linked list") --- This patch is a result of the following discussion: https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg239256.html --- drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c | 21 ++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c index 3955f84dc893..f5905c239a86 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c @@ -255,7 +255,6 @@ struct exynos_dsi { struct mipi_dsi_host dsi_host; struct drm_connector connector; struct drm_panel *panel; - struct list_head bridge_chain; struct drm_bridge *out_bridge; struct device *dev;
@@ -1391,7 +1390,8 @@ static void exynos_dsi_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) if (ret < 0) goto err_put_sync; } else { - drm_bridge_chain_pre_enable(dsi->out_bridge); + if (dsi->out_bridge->funcs->pre_enable) + dsi->out_bridge->funcs->pre_enable(dsi->out_bridge); }
exynos_dsi_set_display_mode(dsi); @@ -1402,7 +1402,8 @@ static void exynos_dsi_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) if (ret < 0) goto err_display_disable; } else { - drm_bridge_chain_enable(dsi->out_bridge); + if (dsi->out_bridge->funcs->enable) + dsi->out_bridge->funcs->enable(dsi->out_bridge); }
dsi->state |= DSIM_STATE_VIDOUT_AVAILABLE; @@ -1427,10 +1428,12 @@ static void exynos_dsi_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) dsi->state &= ~DSIM_STATE_VIDOUT_AVAILABLE;
drm_panel_disable(dsi->panel); - drm_bridge_chain_disable(dsi->out_bridge); + if (dsi->out_bridge->funcs->disable) + dsi->out_bridge->funcs->disable(dsi->out_bridge); exynos_dsi_set_display_enable(dsi, false); drm_panel_unprepare(dsi->panel); - drm_bridge_chain_post_disable(dsi->out_bridge); + if (dsi->out_bridge->funcs->post_disable) + dsi->out_bridge->funcs->post_disable(dsi->out_bridge); dsi->state &= ~DSIM_STATE_ENABLED; pm_runtime_put_sync(dsi->dev); } @@ -1521,9 +1524,11 @@ static int exynos_dsi_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
out_bridge = of_drm_find_bridge(device->dev.of_node); if (out_bridge) { - drm_bridge_attach(encoder, out_bridge, NULL); + out_bridge->dev = drm; + out_bridge->encoder = encoder; + if (out_bridge->funcs->attach) + out_bridge->funcs->attach(out_bridge); dsi->out_bridge = out_bridge; - list_splice(&encoder->bridge_chain, &dsi->bridge_chain); } else { int ret = exynos_dsi_create_connector(encoder);
@@ -1589,7 +1594,6 @@ static int exynos_dsi_host_detach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host, if (dsi->out_bridge->funcs->detach) dsi->out_bridge->funcs->detach(dsi->out_bridge); dsi->out_bridge = NULL; - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dsi->bridge_chain); }
if (drm->mode_config.poll_enabled) @@ -1737,7 +1741,6 @@ static int exynos_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) init_completion(&dsi->completed); spin_lock_init(&dsi->transfer_lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dsi->transfer_list); - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dsi->bridge_chain);
dsi->dsi_host.ops = &exynos_dsi_ops; dsi->dsi_host.dev = dev;
On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 12:01:35 +0100 Marek Szyprowski m.szyprowski@samsung.com wrote:
Exynos DSI DRM driver uses private calls to out bridge to force certain order of operations during init/exit sequences. This no longer works after conversion of bridge chain to a double-linked list. To fix the regression call bridge related operations manually instead of the generic drm_bridge_chain_*() operations.
I think it'd be worth explaining what the problem is (infinite loop caused by list_for_each_entry() use when the bridge is no longer part of the chain attached to the encoder).
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski m.szyprowski@samsung.com Fixes: 05193dc38197 ("drm/bridge: Make the bridge chain a double-linked list")
We also need to fix that in VC4.
This patch is a result of the following discussion: https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg239256.html
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c | 21 ++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c index 3955f84dc893..f5905c239a86 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c @@ -255,7 +255,6 @@ struct exynos_dsi { struct mipi_dsi_host dsi_host; struct drm_connector connector; struct drm_panel *panel;
- struct list_head bridge_chain; struct drm_bridge *out_bridge; struct device *dev;
@@ -1391,7 +1390,8 @@ static void exynos_dsi_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) if (ret < 0) goto err_put_sync; } else {
drm_bridge_chain_pre_enable(dsi->out_bridge);
if (dsi->out_bridge->funcs->pre_enable)
dsi->out_bridge->funcs->pre_enable(dsi->out_bridge);
Okay, so you're calling ->{pre_enable,enable,disable,post_disable}() on the first bridge element which only works if the chain contains one bridge (see below). Maybe you should keep exynos_dsi.bridge_chain and create custom helpers to iterate over chain elements instead of calling those hooks only on out_bridge.
}
exynos_dsi_set_display_mode(dsi); @@ -1402,7 +1402,8 @@ static void exynos_dsi_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) if (ret < 0) goto err_display_disable; } else {
drm_bridge_chain_enable(dsi->out_bridge);
if (dsi->out_bridge->funcs->enable)
dsi->out_bridge->funcs->enable(dsi->out_bridge);
}
dsi->state |= DSIM_STATE_VIDOUT_AVAILABLE;
@@ -1427,10 +1428,12 @@ static void exynos_dsi_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) dsi->state &= ~DSIM_STATE_VIDOUT_AVAILABLE;
drm_panel_disable(dsi->panel);
- drm_bridge_chain_disable(dsi->out_bridge);
- if (dsi->out_bridge->funcs->disable)
exynos_dsi_set_display_enable(dsi, false); drm_panel_unprepare(dsi->panel);dsi->out_bridge->funcs->disable(dsi->out_bridge);
- drm_bridge_chain_post_disable(dsi->out_bridge);
- if (dsi->out_bridge->funcs->post_disable)
dsi->state &= ~DSIM_STATE_ENABLED; pm_runtime_put_sync(dsi->dev);dsi->out_bridge->funcs->post_disable(dsi->out_bridge);
} @@ -1521,9 +1524,11 @@ static int exynos_dsi_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
out_bridge = of_drm_find_bridge(device->dev.of_node); if (out_bridge) {
drm_bridge_attach(encoder, out_bridge, NULL);
out_bridge->dev = drm;
out_bridge->encoder = encoder;
if (out_bridge->funcs->attach)
out_bridge->funcs->attach(out_bridge);
If you don't want to keep the dsi_exynos.bridge_chain field, you should probably still use drm_bridge_attach() here and manually reset encoder->bridge_chain after checking it only contains a single element. Something like:
drm_bridge_attach(encoder, out_bridge, NULL);
/* * FIXME: we need to control the enable/disable * sequence to make sure the DSI host controller is * ready to send DSI commands before the * bridge->pre_enable()/panel->prepare() hooks are * called (those hooks are allowed to send DSI * commands). The only way to do that right now is to * reset the bridge chain so that the core thinks it's * empty and turns drm_bridge_chain_xxx() calls into * NOPs. This only works if the chain contains only one * bridge, otherwise we'd be skipping bridge->xxx() * calls on other bridges which is wrong. */ WARN_ON(!list_is_singular(&encoder->bridge_chain)); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&encoder->bridge_chain);
Calling ->attach() directly might lead to an invalid pointer dereference if out_bridge tries to attach to another bridge (out_bridge->bridge_node is uninitialized if you don't call drm_bridge_attach()).
dsi->out_bridge = out_bridge;
} else { int ret = exynos_dsi_create_connector(encoder);list_splice(&encoder->bridge_chain, &dsi->bridge_chain);
@@ -1589,7 +1594,6 @@ static int exynos_dsi_host_detach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host, if (dsi->out_bridge->funcs->detach) dsi->out_bridge->funcs->detach(dsi->out_bridge); dsi->out_bridge = NULL;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dsi->bridge_chain);
}
if (drm->mode_config.poll_enabled)
@@ -1737,7 +1741,6 @@ static int exynos_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) init_completion(&dsi->completed); spin_lock_init(&dsi->transfer_lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dsi->transfer_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dsi->bridge_chain);
dsi->dsi_host.ops = &exynos_dsi_ops; dsi->dsi_host.dev = dev;
On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 13:00:04 +0100 Boris Brezillon boris.brezillon@collabora.com wrote:
On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 12:01:35 +0100 Marek Szyprowski m.szyprowski@samsung.com wrote:
Exynos DSI DRM driver uses private calls to out bridge to force certain order of operations during init/exit sequences. This no longer works after conversion of bridge chain to a double-linked list. To fix the regression call bridge related operations manually instead of the generic drm_bridge_chain_*() operations.
I think it'd be worth explaining what the problem is (infinite loop caused by list_for_each_entry() use when the bridge is no longer part of the chain attached to the encoder).
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski m.szyprowski@samsung.com Fixes: 05193dc38197 ("drm/bridge: Make the bridge chain a double-linked list")
We also need to fix that in VC4.
This patch is a result of the following discussion: https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg239256.html
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c | 21 ++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c index 3955f84dc893..f5905c239a86 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c @@ -255,7 +255,6 @@ struct exynos_dsi { struct mipi_dsi_host dsi_host; struct drm_connector connector; struct drm_panel *panel;
- struct list_head bridge_chain; struct drm_bridge *out_bridge; struct device *dev;
@@ -1391,7 +1390,8 @@ static void exynos_dsi_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) if (ret < 0) goto err_put_sync; } else {
drm_bridge_chain_pre_enable(dsi->out_bridge);
if (dsi->out_bridge->funcs->pre_enable)
dsi->out_bridge->funcs->pre_enable(dsi->out_bridge);
Okay, so you're calling ->{pre_enable,enable,disable,post_disable}() on the first bridge element which only works if the chain contains one bridge (see below). Maybe you should keep exynos_dsi.bridge_chain and create custom helpers to iterate over chain elements instead of calling those hooks only on out_bridge.
The following diff should fix the problem while keeping the solution generic enough to support chains containing more than one bridge.
--->8--- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c index 3955f84dc893..c861b640fc59 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c @@ -1378,6 +1378,7 @@ static void exynos_dsi_unregister_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi) static void exynos_dsi_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) { struct exynos_dsi *dsi = encoder_to_dsi(encoder); + struct drm_bridge *iter; int ret;
if (dsi->state & DSIM_STATE_ENABLED) @@ -1391,7 +1392,11 @@ static void exynos_dsi_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) if (ret < 0) goto err_put_sync; } else { - drm_bridge_chain_pre_enable(dsi->out_bridge); + list_for_each_entry_reverse(iter, &encoder->bridge_chain, + chain_node) { + if (iter->funcs->pre_enable) + iter->funcs->pre_enable(iter); + } }
exynos_dsi_set_display_mode(dsi); @@ -1402,7 +1407,10 @@ static void exynos_dsi_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) if (ret < 0) goto err_display_disable; } else { - drm_bridge_chain_enable(dsi->out_bridge); + list_for_each_entry(iter, &encoder->bridge_chain, chain_node) { + if (iter->funcs->enable) + iter->funcs->enable(iter); + } }
dsi->state |= DSIM_STATE_VIDOUT_AVAILABLE; @@ -1420,6 +1428,7 @@ static void exynos_dsi_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) static void exynos_dsi_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) { struct exynos_dsi *dsi = encoder_to_dsi(encoder); + struct drm_bridge *iter;
if (!(dsi->state & DSIM_STATE_ENABLED)) return; @@ -1427,10 +1436,20 @@ static void exynos_dsi_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) dsi->state &= ~DSIM_STATE_VIDOUT_AVAILABLE;
drm_panel_disable(dsi->panel); - drm_bridge_chain_disable(dsi->out_bridge); + + list_for_each_entry_reverse(iter, &encoder->bridge_chain, chain_node) { + if (iter->funcs->disable) + iter->funcs->disable(iter); + } + exynos_dsi_set_display_enable(dsi, false); drm_panel_unprepare(dsi->panel); - drm_bridge_chain_post_disable(dsi->out_bridge); + + list_for_each_entry(iter, &encoder->bridge_chain, chain_node) { + if (iter->funcs->post_disable) + iter->funcs->post_disable(iter); + } + dsi->state &= ~DSIM_STATE_ENABLED; pm_runtime_put_sync(dsi->dev); } @@ -1523,7 +1542,7 @@ static int exynos_dsi_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host, if (out_bridge) { drm_bridge_attach(encoder, out_bridge, NULL); dsi->out_bridge = out_bridge; - list_splice(&encoder->bridge_chain, &dsi->bridge_chain); + list_splice_init(&encoder->bridge_chain, &dsi->bridge_chain); } else { int ret = exynos_dsi_create_connector(encoder);
On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 14:23:13 +0100 Boris Brezillon boris.brezillon@collabora.com wrote:
On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 13:00:04 +0100 Boris Brezillon boris.brezillon@collabora.com wrote:
On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 12:01:35 +0100 Marek Szyprowski m.szyprowski@samsung.com wrote:
Exynos DSI DRM driver uses private calls to out bridge to force certain order of operations during init/exit sequences. This no longer works after conversion of bridge chain to a double-linked list. To fix the regression call bridge related operations manually instead of the generic drm_bridge_chain_*() operations.
I think it'd be worth explaining what the problem is (infinite loop caused by list_for_each_entry() use when the bridge is no longer part of the chain attached to the encoder).
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski m.szyprowski@samsung.com Fixes: 05193dc38197 ("drm/bridge: Make the bridge chain a double-linked list")
We also need to fix that in VC4.
This patch is a result of the following discussion: https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg239256.html
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c | 21 ++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c index 3955f84dc893..f5905c239a86 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c @@ -255,7 +255,6 @@ struct exynos_dsi { struct mipi_dsi_host dsi_host; struct drm_connector connector; struct drm_panel *panel;
- struct list_head bridge_chain; struct drm_bridge *out_bridge; struct device *dev;
@@ -1391,7 +1390,8 @@ static void exynos_dsi_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) if (ret < 0) goto err_put_sync; } else {
drm_bridge_chain_pre_enable(dsi->out_bridge);
if (dsi->out_bridge->funcs->pre_enable)
dsi->out_bridge->funcs->pre_enable(dsi->out_bridge);
Okay, so you're calling ->{pre_enable,enable,disable,post_disable}() on the first bridge element which only works if the chain contains one bridge (see below). Maybe you should keep exynos_dsi.bridge_chain and create custom helpers to iterate over chain elements instead of calling those hooks only on out_bridge.
The following diff should fix the problem while keeping the solution generic enough to support chains containing more than one bridge.
--->8--- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c index 3955f84dc893..c861b640fc59 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c @@ -1378,6 +1378,7 @@ static void exynos_dsi_unregister_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi) static void exynos_dsi_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) { struct exynos_dsi *dsi = encoder_to_dsi(encoder);
struct drm_bridge *iter; int ret; if (dsi->state & DSIM_STATE_ENABLED)
@@ -1391,7 +1392,11 @@ static void exynos_dsi_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) if (ret < 0) goto err_put_sync; } else {
drm_bridge_chain_pre_enable(dsi->out_bridge);
list_for_each_entry_reverse(iter, &encoder->bridge_chain,
^&dsi->bridge_chain
And the same applies to all list_for_each() calls in this patch.
chain_node) {
if (iter->funcs->pre_enable)
iter->funcs->pre_enable(iter);
} } exynos_dsi_set_display_mode(dsi);
@@ -1402,7 +1407,10 @@ static void exynos_dsi_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) if (ret < 0) goto err_display_disable; } else {
drm_bridge_chain_enable(dsi->out_bridge);
list_for_each_entry(iter, &encoder->bridge_chain, chain_node) {
if (iter->funcs->enable)
iter->funcs->enable(iter);
} } dsi->state |= DSIM_STATE_VIDOUT_AVAILABLE;
@@ -1420,6 +1428,7 @@ static void exynos_dsi_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) static void exynos_dsi_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) { struct exynos_dsi *dsi = encoder_to_dsi(encoder);
struct drm_bridge *iter; if (!(dsi->state & DSIM_STATE_ENABLED)) return;
@@ -1427,10 +1436,20 @@ static void exynos_dsi_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) dsi->state &= ~DSIM_STATE_VIDOUT_AVAILABLE;
drm_panel_disable(dsi->panel);
drm_bridge_chain_disable(dsi->out_bridge);
list_for_each_entry_reverse(iter, &encoder->bridge_chain, chain_node) {
if (iter->funcs->disable)
iter->funcs->disable(iter);
}
exynos_dsi_set_display_enable(dsi, false); drm_panel_unprepare(dsi->panel);
drm_bridge_chain_post_disable(dsi->out_bridge);
list_for_each_entry(iter, &encoder->bridge_chain, chain_node) {
if (iter->funcs->post_disable)
iter->funcs->post_disable(iter);
}
dsi->state &= ~DSIM_STATE_ENABLED; pm_runtime_put_sync(dsi->dev);
} @@ -1523,7 +1542,7 @@ static int exynos_dsi_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host, if (out_bridge) { drm_bridge_attach(encoder, out_bridge, NULL); dsi->out_bridge = out_bridge;
list_splice(&encoder->bridge_chain, &dsi->bridge_chain);
list_splice_init(&encoder->bridge_chain, &dsi->bridge_chain); } else { int ret = exynos_dsi_create_connector(encoder);
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org