The ctx->hw is dereferencing before null checking, so move it after checking.
Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai baihaowen@meizu.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c index bcccce292937..e59680cdd0ce 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c @@ -155,11 +155,13 @@ static void dpu_hw_wb_roi(struct dpu_hw_wb *ctx, struct dpu_hw_wb_cfg *wb) static void dpu_hw_wb_setup_qos_lut(struct dpu_hw_wb *ctx, struct dpu_hw_wb_qos_cfg *cfg) { - struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *c = &ctx->hw; + struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *c; u32 qos_ctrl = 0;
if (!ctx || !cfg) return; + + c = &ctx->hw;
DPU_REG_WRITE(c, WB_DANGER_LUT, cfg->danger_lut); DPU_REG_WRITE(c, WB_SAFE_LUT, cfg->safe_lut);
A nit: patchwork thinks that two patches from the same author with the same subject are two versions of the same patch. In future, could you please send such patches with distinct names? No need to send v2 now unless review shows other issues with the patches.
On Mon, 30 May 2022 at 10:33, Haowen Bai baihaowen@meizu.com wrote:
The ctx->hw is dereferencing before null checking, so move it after checking.
Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai baihaowen@meizu.com
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
On 5/30/2022 12:33 AM, Haowen Bai wrote:
The ctx->hw is dereferencing before null checking, so move it after checking.
Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai baihaowen@meizu.com
Agree with Dmitry's comment. Adjust the patch subject to a different one otherwise PW thinks they are same patches.
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c index bcccce292937..e59680cdd0ce 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c @@ -155,11 +155,13 @@ static void dpu_hw_wb_roi(struct dpu_hw_wb *ctx, struct dpu_hw_wb_cfg *wb) static void dpu_hw_wb_setup_qos_lut(struct dpu_hw_wb *ctx, struct dpu_hw_wb_qos_cfg *cfg) {
- struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *c = &ctx->hw;
struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *c; u32 qos_ctrl = 0;
if (!ctx || !cfg) return;
c = &ctx->hw;
DPU_REG_WRITE(c, WB_DANGER_LUT, cfg->danger_lut); DPU_REG_WRITE(c, WB_SAFE_LUT, cfg->safe_lut);
在 2022/5/31 上午8:36, Abhinav Kumar 写道:
On 5/30/2022 12:33 AM, Haowen Bai wrote:
The ctx->hw is dereferencing before null checking, so move it after checking.
Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai baihaowen@meizu.com
Agree with Dmitry's comment. Adjust the patch subject to a different one otherwise PW thinks they are same patches.
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c index bcccce292937..e59680cdd0ce 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c @@ -155,11 +155,13 @@ static void dpu_hw_wb_roi(struct dpu_hw_wb *ctx, struct dpu_hw_wb_cfg *wb) static void dpu_hw_wb_setup_qos_lut(struct dpu_hw_wb *ctx, struct dpu_hw_wb_qos_cfg *cfg) { - struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *c = &ctx->hw; + struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *c; u32 qos_ctrl = 0; if (!ctx || !cfg) return; + + c = &ctx->hw; DPU_REG_WRITE(c, WB_DANGER_LUT, cfg->danger_lut); DPU_REG_WRITE(c, WB_SAFE_LUT, cfg->safe_lut);
Sorry, plz ignore this patch.
ctx->hw is dereferenced, &ctx->hw is just a pointer math for pointer address offset, so it would not cause a bug(dereferencing null pointer).
在 2022/5/30 下午3:33, Haowen Bai 写道:
The ctx->hw is dereferencing before null checking, so move it after checking.
Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai baihaowen@meizu.com
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c index bcccce292937..e59680cdd0ce 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c @@ -155,11 +155,13 @@ static void dpu_hw_wb_roi(struct dpu_hw_wb *ctx, struct dpu_hw_wb_cfg *wb) static void dpu_hw_wb_setup_qos_lut(struct dpu_hw_wb *ctx, struct dpu_hw_wb_qos_cfg *cfg) {
- struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *c = &ctx->hw;
struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *c; u32 qos_ctrl = 0;
if (!ctx || !cfg) return;
c = &ctx->hw;
DPU_REG_WRITE(c, WB_DANGER_LUT, cfg->danger_lut); DPU_REG_WRITE(c, WB_SAFE_LUT, cfg->safe_lut);
Sorry, plz ignore this patch.
ctx->hw is dereferenced, &ctx->hw is just a pointer math for pointer address offset, so it would not cause a bug(dereferencing null pointer).
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 12:34 AM Haowen Bai baihaowen@meizu.com wrote:
The ctx->hw is dereferencing before null checking, so move it after checking.
Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai baihaowen@meizu.com
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c index bcccce292937..e59680cdd0ce 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_wb.c @@ -155,11 +155,13 @@ static void dpu_hw_wb_roi(struct dpu_hw_wb *ctx, struct dpu_hw_wb_cfg *wb) static void dpu_hw_wb_setup_qos_lut(struct dpu_hw_wb *ctx, struct dpu_hw_wb_qos_cfg *cfg) {
struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *c = &ctx->hw;
struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *c; u32 qos_ctrl = 0; if (!ctx || !cfg) return;c = &ctx->hw;
tbh, we should just drop both of these null checks.. there is no codepath that can reach this with potential for either param to be NULL
BR, -R
DPU_REG_WRITE(c, WB_DANGER_LUT, cfg->danger_lut); DPU_REG_WRITE(c, WB_SAFE_LUT, cfg->safe_lut);-- 2.7.4
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
-
Abhinav Kumar -
baihaowen -
Dmitry Baryshkov -
Haowen Bai
-
Rob Clark