A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC.
Fixes: d5c65159f289 ("ath11k: driver for Qualcomm IEEE 802.11ax devices") Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun weiyongjun1@huawei.com --- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c index f74a0e74bf3e..34b1e8e6a7fb 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c @@ -892,7 +892,7 @@ int ath11k_peer_rx_tid_setup(struct ath11k *ar, const u8 *peer_mac, int vdev_id, else hw_desc_sz = ath11k_hal_reo_qdesc_size(DP_BA_WIN_SZ_MAX, tid);
- vaddr = kzalloc(hw_desc_sz + HAL_LINK_DESC_ALIGN - 1, GFP_KERNEL); + vaddr = kzalloc(hw_desc_sz + HAL_LINK_DESC_ALIGN - 1, GFP_ATOMIC); if (!vaddr) { spin_unlock_bh(&ab->base_lock); return -ENOMEM;
Wei Yongjun weiyongjun1@huawei.com writes:
A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC.
Fixes: d5c65159f289 ("ath11k: driver for Qualcomm IEEE 802.11ax devices") Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun weiyongjun1@huawei.com
Do note that ath11k patches go to my ath.git tree, not net-next. But no need to resend because of this.
Wei Yongjun weiyongjun1@huawei.com wrote:
A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC.
Fixes: d5c65159f289 ("ath11k: driver for Qualcomm IEEE 802.11ax devices") Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun weiyongjun1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo kvalo@codeaurora.org
Patch applied to ath-next branch of ath.git, thanks.
69c93f9674c9 ath11k: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org