The implmentation is simple in the extreme: we only want to wait for events if the device was opened in blocking mode, otherwise we grab what is available and report an error if there was none.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c index ed7bc68f7e87..91e1105f2800 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c @@ -515,10 +515,12 @@ ssize_t drm_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buffer, size_t total; ssize_t ret;
- ret = wait_event_interruptible(file_priv->event_wait, - !list_empty(&file_priv->event_list)); - if (ret < 0) - return ret; + if ((filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) == 0) { + ret = wait_event_interruptible(file_priv->event_wait, + !list_empty(&file_priv->event_list)); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + }
total = 0; while (drm_dequeue_event(file_priv, total, count, &e)) { @@ -532,7 +534,7 @@ ssize_t drm_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buffer, e->destroy(e); }
- return total; + return total ?: -EAGAIN; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_read);
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 14:13:51 +0100 Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
The implmentation is simple in the extreme: we only want to wait for events if the device was opened in blocking mode, otherwise we grab what is available and report an error if there was none.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c index ed7bc68f7e87..91e1105f2800 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c @@ -515,10 +515,12 @@ ssize_t drm_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buffer, size_t total; ssize_t ret;
- ret = wait_event_interruptible(file_priv->event_wait,
!list_empty(&file_priv->event_list));
- if (ret < 0)
return ret;
if ((filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) == 0) {
ret = wait_event_interruptible(file_priv->event_wait,
!list_empty(&file_priv->event_list));
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
}
total = 0; while (drm_dequeue_event(file_priv, total, count, &e)) {
@@ -532,7 +534,7 @@ ssize_t drm_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buffer, e->destroy(e); }
- return total;
- return total ?: -EAGAIN;
} EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_read);
I'd prefer "total" to be spelled out after the ? (is this just a GNU thing or does recent C implicitly use the first operand too?), but that's no biggie. Looks fine.
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
The implmentation is simple in the extreme: we only want to wait for events if the device was opened in blocking mode, otherwise we grab what is available and report an error if there was none.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Testcase for nonblocking behaviour in kms_flip? -Daniel
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 11:16:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
The implmentation is simple in the extreme: we only want to wait for events if the device was opened in blocking mode, otherwise we grab what is available and report an error if there was none.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Testcase for nonblocking behaviour in kms_flip?
To the further dismay of anyone running kms_flip today, Testcase: igt/kms_flip/nonblocing_read -Chris
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:45:48AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 11:16:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
The implmentation is simple in the extreme: we only want to wait for events if the device was opened in blocking mode, otherwise we grab what is available and report an error if there was none.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Testcase for nonblocking behaviour in kms_flip?
To the further dismay of anyone running kms_flip today, Testcase: igt/kms_flip/nonblocing_read
Not if they upgrade to -nightly ;-) Thanks for the patch, merged to topic/core-stuff. -Daniel
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org