This patch fixes coccinelle error regarding usage of IS_ERR and PTR_ERR instead of PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO.
Signed-off-by: Duan Jiong duanj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/gem.c | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/gem.c index 28a9cbc..ba6a7ac 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/gem.c @@ -199,10 +199,7 @@ int tegra_bo_dumb_create(struct drm_file *file, struct drm_device *drm,
bo = tegra_bo_create_with_handle(file, drm, args->size, 0, &args->handle); - if (IS_ERR(bo)) - return PTR_ERR(bo); - - return 0; + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(bo); }
int tegra_bo_dumb_map_offset(struct drm_file *file, struct drm_device *drm,
On 11/06/2013 12:53 AM, Duan Jiong wrote:
This patch fixes coccinelle error regarding usage of IS_ERR and PTR_ERR instead of PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/gem.c
@@ -199,10 +199,7 @@ int tegra_bo_dumb_create(struct drm_file *file, struct drm_device *drm,
bo = tegra_bo_create_with_handle(file, drm, args->size, 0, &args->handle);
- if (IS_ERR(bo))
return PTR_ERR(bo);- return 0;
- return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(bo);
}
I suppose that's fine, although I wonder if it'll cause churn should we ever need to add code to the tail end of the function.
BTW, why were all the similar patches that had nothing to do with Tegra sent to the linux-tegra@ mailing list? You also didn't CC the maintainers of drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/ on this patch. Plus this patch has nothing to do with the rtc-linux@ mailing list.
于 2013年11月07日 00:49, Stephen Warren 写道:
On 11/06/2013 12:53 AM, Duan Jiong wrote:
This patch fixes coccinelle error regarding usage of IS_ERR and PTR_ERR instead of PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/gem.c
@@ -199,10 +199,7 @@ int tegra_bo_dumb_create(struct drm_file *file, struct drm_device *drm,
bo = tegra_bo_create_with_handle(file, drm, args->size, 0, &args->handle);
- if (IS_ERR(bo))
return PTR_ERR(bo);- return 0;
- return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(bo);
}
I suppose that's fine, although I wonder if it'll cause churn should we ever need to add code to the tail end of the function.
BTW, why were all the similar patches that had nothing to do with Tegra sent to the linux-tegra@ mailing list? You also didn't CC the maintainers of drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/ on this patch. Plus this patch has nothing to do with the rtc-linux@ mailing list.
I'm sorry for that. i just get the maintainers and the mail lists by the script get_maintainer.pl.
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 05:49:55PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/06/2013 12:53 AM, Duan Jiong wrote:
This patch fixes coccinelle error regarding usage of IS_ERR and PTR_ERR instead of PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/gem.c
@@ -199,10 +199,7 @@ int tegra_bo_dumb_create(struct drm_file *file, struct drm_device *drm,
bo = tegra_bo_create_with_handle(file, drm, args->size, 0, &args->handle);
- if (IS_ERR(bo))
return PTR_ERR(bo);- return 0;
- return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(bo);
}
I suppose that's fine, although I wonder if it'll cause churn should we ever need to add code to the tail end of the function.
It's unlikely that we'll ever need to add to this function. But I'm not a big fan of PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO to be honest, so I'll let this sink in for a bit before applying.
Thierry
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
-
Duan Jiong -
Stephen Warren -
Thierry Reding