Commit f15a3ea80391 ("MAINTAINERS: Add ASPEED BMC GFX DRM driver entry") does not mention that linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org is moderated for non-subscribers, but the other three entries for linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org do.
By 'majority vote' among entries, let us assume it was just missed here and adjust it to be consistent with others.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com --- applies cleanly on master and next-20200911
Joel, please ack. David, Daniel, please pick this minor non-urgent clean-up patch.
This patch submission will also show me if linux-aspeed is moderated or not. I have not subscribed to linux-aspeed and if it shows up quickly in the archive, the list is probably not moderated; and if it takes longer, it is moderated, and hence, validating the patch.
MAINTAINERS | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 26af84f97353..f2561c3fc9db 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -5448,7 +5448,7 @@ F: drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-arm-versatile.c
DRM DRIVER FOR ASPEED BMC GFX M: Joel Stanley joel@jms.id.au -L: linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org +L: linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org (moderated for non-subscribers) S: Supported T: git git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/aspeed-gfx.txt
On Sun, 13 Sep 2020 at 09:57, Lukas Bulwahn lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com wrote:
The bmc related lists (openbmc@, linux-aspeed@, linux-fsi@) on ozlabs.org that I own have a soft-moderation policy. The first time you post a patch I add you to a whitelist. Given the low volume on these lists this works for me.
I don't know if this necessitates marking the lists as moderated in MAINTINERS, but if you find that helpful then that's fine with me.
Acked-by: Joel Stanley joel@jms.id.au
Cheers,
Joel
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 08:33:34PM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
Pushed to drm-misc-next, thanks. -Daniel
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
-
Daniel Vetter -
Joel Stanley -
Lukas Bulwahn