Hello Tvrtko Ursulin,

The patch de1add360522: "drm/i915: Decouple execbuf uAPI from internal implementation" from Jan 15, 2016, leads to the following static checker warning:

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:1411 eb_select_ring() warn: buffer overflow 'dev_priv->ring' 5 <= 16385

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c 1397 if (user_ring_id == I915_EXEC_BSD && HAS_BSD2(dev_priv)) { 1398 unsigned int bsd_idx = args->flags & I915_EXEC_BSD_MASK; 1399 1400 if (bsd_idx == I915_EXEC_BSD_DEFAULT) { 1401 bsd_idx = gen8_dispatch_bsd_ring(dev_priv, file); 1402 } else if (bsd_idx >= I915_EXEC_BSD_RING1 && 1403 bsd_idx <= I915_EXEC_BSD_RING2) { 1404 bsd_idx--; ^^^^^^^^^ This should probablye be "bsd_idx = (bsd_idx >> 13) - 1;" or something.

1405 } else { 1406 DRM_DEBUG("execbuf with unknown bsd ring: %u\n", 1407 bsd_idx); 1408 return -EINVAL; 1409 } 1410 1411 *ring = &dev_priv->ring[_VCS(bsd_idx)];

Otherwise we're way past the end of this array.

1412 } else { 1413 *ring = &dev_priv->ring[user_ring_map[user_ring_id]]; 1414 } 1415 1416 if (!intel_ring_initialized(*ring)) { 1417 DRM_DEBUG("execbuf with invalid ring: %u\n", user_ring_id); 1418 return -EINVAL; 1419 }

regards, dan carpenter