Document the R-Car V3H (R8A77980) SoC in the R-Car DU bindings; the DU hardware seems the same as in the R-Car V3M (R8A77970).
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com
--- The patch is against the 'drm-next' branch of David Airlie's 'linux.git' repo.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Index: linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt =================================================================== --- linux.orig/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt +++ linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ Required Properties: - "renesas,du-r8a7795" for R8A7795 (R-Car H3) compatible DU - "renesas,du-r8a7796" for R8A7796 (R-Car M3-W) compatible DU - "renesas,du-r8a77970" for R8A77970 (R-Car V3M) compatible DU + - "renesas,du-r8a77980" for R8A77980 (R-Car V3H) compatible DU - "renesas,du-r8a77995" for R8A77995 (R-Car D3) compatible DU
- reg: the memory-mapped I/O registers base address and length @@ -60,6 +61,7 @@ corresponding to each DU output. R8A7795 (R-Car H3) DPAD 0 HDMI 0 HDMI 1 LVDS 0 R8A7796 (R-Car M3-W) DPAD 0 HDMI 0 LVDS 0 - R8A77970 (R-Car V3M) DPAD 0 LVDS 0 - - + R8A77980 (R-Car V3H) DPAD 0 LVDS 0 - - R8A77995 (R-Car D3) DPAD 0 LVDS 0 LVDS 1 -
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 10:04:59PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Document the R-Car V3H (R8A77980) SoC in the R-Car DU bindings; the DU hardware seems the same as in the R-Car V3M (R8A77970).
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman horms+renesas@verge.net.au
The patch is against the 'drm-next' branch of David Airlie's 'linux.git' repo.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Index: linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt
--- linux.orig/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt +++ linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ Required Properties: - "renesas,du-r8a7795" for R8A7795 (R-Car H3) compatible DU - "renesas,du-r8a7796" for R8A7796 (R-Car M3-W) compatible DU - "renesas,du-r8a77970" for R8A77970 (R-Car V3M) compatible DU
"renesas,du-r8a77980" for R8A77980 (R-Car V3H) compatible DU
"renesas,du-r8a77995" for R8A77995 (R-Car D3) compatible DU
reg: the memory-mapped I/O registers base address and length
@@ -60,6 +61,7 @@ corresponding to each DU output. R8A7795 (R-Car H3) DPAD 0 HDMI 0 HDMI 1 LVDS 0 R8A7796 (R-Car M3-W) DPAD 0 HDMI 0 LVDS 0 - R8A77970 (R-Car V3M) DPAD 0 LVDS 0 - -
- R8A77980 (R-Car V3H) DPAD 0 LVDS 0 - - R8A77995 (R-Car D3) DPAD 0 LVDS 0 LVDS 1 -
Hi Sergei,
Thank you for the patch.
On Monday, 4 June 2018 22:04:59 EEST Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Document the R-Car V3H (R8A77980) SoC in the R-Car DU bindings; the DU hardware seems the same as in the R-Car V3M (R8A77970).
How about "the DU hardware has the same topology as in the R-Car V3M (R8A77970)" ? "seems" sounds like we're very unsure :-)
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com
The patch is against the 'drm-next' branch of David Airlie's 'linux.git' repo.
Then you might want to switch to git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm :-)
Apart from that,
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com
If you agree with the small change to the commit message I'll fix the conflict locally, there's no need to resubmit.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Index: linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt
--- linux.orig/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt +++ linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ Required Properties: - "renesas,du-r8a7795" for R8A7795 (R-Car H3) compatible DU - "renesas,du-r8a7796" for R8A7796 (R-Car M3-W) compatible DU - "renesas,du-r8a77970" for R8A77970 (R-Car V3M) compatible DU
"renesas,du-r8a77980" for R8A77980 (R-Car V3H) compatible DU
"renesas,du-r8a77995" for R8A77995 (R-Car D3) compatible DU
reg: the memory-mapped I/O registers base address and length
@@ -60,6 +61,7 @@ corresponding to each DU output. R8A7795 (R-Car H3) DPAD 0 HDMI 0 HDMI 1 LVDS 0 R8A7796 (R-Car M3-W) DPAD 0 HDMI 0 LVDS 0 - R8A77970 (R-Car V3M) DPAD 0 LVDS 0 - -
- R8A77980 (R-Car V3H) DPAD 0 LVDS 0 - - R8A77995 (R-Car D3) DPAD 0 LVDS 0 LVDS 1 -
On 06/05/2018 01:09 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Document the R-Car V3H (R8A77980) SoC in the R-Car DU bindings; the DU hardware seems the same as in the R-Car V3M (R8A77970).
How about "the DU hardware has the same topology as in the R-Car V3M (R8A77970)" ? "seems" sounds like we're very unsure :-)
That's probably better, indeed.
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com
The patch is against the 'drm-next' branch of David Airlie's 'linux.git' repo.
Then you might want to switch to git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm :-)
No, the corresponding MAINTAINERS records don't include drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/ or worse yet, the DU bindings. :-) Seriously, I thought you've done a patch to remove your dead 'fbdev' repo months ago and IO'm still seeing it listed... :-/
Apart from that,
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com
If you agree with the small change to the commit message I'll fix the conflict locally, there's no need to resubmit.
I do agree, except I don't know what conflict you mean.
[...]
MBR, Sergei
Hi Sergei,
On Tuesday, 5 June 2018 21:57:47 EEST Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
On 06/05/2018 01:09 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Document the R-Car V3H (R8A77980) SoC in the R-Car DU bindings; the DU hardware seems the same as in the R-Car V3M (R8A77970).
How about "the DU hardware has the same topology as in the R-Car V3M (R8A77970)" ? "seems" sounds like we're very unsure :-)
That's probably better, indeed.
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com
The patch is against the 'drm-next' branch of David Airlie's 'linux.git' repo.
Then you might want to switch to git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm :-)
No, the corresponding MAINTAINERS records don't include drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/ or worse yet, the DU bindings. :-)
My point is that Dave's tree has moved.
Seriously, I thought you've done a patch to remove your dead 'fbdev' repo months ago and IO'm still seeing it listed... :-/
I'll address that now.
Apart from that,
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com
If you agree with the small change to the commit message I'll fix the conflict locally, there's no need to resubmit.
I do agree, except I don't know what conflict you mean.
[...]
I mean the conflict with
commit dc8142901befabea974393d49b803f131243feb4 Author: Kieran Bingham kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com Date: Thu Apr 26 17:53:31 2018 +0100
dt-bindings: display: renesas: du: Document the r8a77965 bindings
that is present in Dave's new tree.
On 06/05/2018 10:16 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Document the R-Car V3H (R8A77980) SoC in the R-Car DU bindings; the DU hardware seems the same as in the R-Car V3M (R8A77970).
How about "the DU hardware has the same topology as in the R-Car V3M (R8A77970)" ? "seems" sounds like we're very unsure :-)
That's probably better, indeed.
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com
The patch is against the 'drm-next' branch of David Airlie's 'linux.git' repo.
Then you might want to switch to git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm :-)
No, the corresponding MAINTAINERS records don't include drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/ or worse yet, the DU bindings. :-)
Well, there is still no corresponding record, actually...
My point is that Dave's tree has moved.
How am I supposed to learn about it, from gossips? :-)
Seriously, I thought you've done a patch to remove your dead 'fbdev' repo months ago and IO'm still seeing it listed... :-/
I'll address that now.
TIA.
Apart from that,
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com
If you agree with the small change to the commit message I'll fix the conflict locally, there's no need to resubmit.
I do agree, except I don't know what conflict you mean.
[...]
I mean the conflict with
commit dc8142901befabea974393d49b803f131243feb4 Author: Kieran Bingham kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com Date: Thu Apr 26 17:53:31 2018 +0100
dt-bindings: display: renesas: du: Document the r8a77965 bindings
that is present in Dave's new tree.
Ah... TIA again. :-)
MBR, Sergei
Hi Sergei,
On Tuesday, 5 June 2018 22:49:57 EEST Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
On 06/05/2018 10:16 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Document the R-Car V3H (R8A77980) SoC in the R-Car DU bindings; the DU hardware seems the same as in the R-Car V3M (R8A77970).
How about "the DU hardware has the same topology as in the R-Car V3M (R8A77970)" ? "seems" sounds like we're very unsure :-)
That's probably better, indeed.
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com
The patch is against the 'drm-next' branch of David Airlie's 'linux.git' repo.
Then you might want to switch to git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm :-)
No, the corresponding MAINTAINERS records don't include drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/ or worse yet, the DU bindings. :-)
Well, there is still no corresponding record, actually...
My point is that Dave's tree has moved.
How am I supposed to learn about it, from gossips? :-)
I learnt it the hard way when a pull request I had prepared against the old tree conflicted (at compile time) with patches merged in the new tree. This broke the build, and I learnt about the new tree from a kbuild bot report.
Seriously, I thought you've done a patch to remove your dead 'fbdev' repo months ago and IO'm still seeing it listed... :-/
I'll address that now.
TIA.
Apart from that,
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com
If you agree with the small change to the commit message I'll fix the conflict locally, there's no need to resubmit.
I do agree, except I don't know what conflict you mean.
[...]
I mean the conflict with
commit dc8142901befabea974393d49b803f131243feb4 Author: Kieran Bingham kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com Date: Thu Apr 26 17:53:31 2018 +0100
dt-bindings: display: renesas: du: Document the r8a77965 bindings
that is present in Dave's new tree.
Ah... TIA again. :-)
Hi Laurent,
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 10:24 PM, Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 June 2018 22:49:57 EEST Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
On 06/05/2018 10:16 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Document the R-Car V3H (R8A77980) SoC in the R-Car DU bindings; the DU hardware seems the same as in the R-Car V3M (R8A77970).
How about "the DU hardware has the same topology as in the R-Car V3M (R8A77970)" ? "seems" sounds like we're very unsure :-)
That's probably better, indeed.
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com
The patch is against the 'drm-next' branch of David Airlie's 'linux.git' repo.
Then you might want to switch to git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm :-)
No, the corresponding MAINTAINERS records don't include drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/ or worse yet, the DU bindings. :-)
Well, there is still no corresponding record, actually...
My point is that Dave's tree has moved.
How am I supposed to learn about it, from gossips? :-)
I learnt it the hard way when a pull request I had prepared against the old tree conflicted (at compile time) with patches merged in the new tree. This broke the build, and I learnt about the new tree from a kbuild bot report.
Updated repo list for renesas-drivers. Thanks for letting me know!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 10:04:59PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Document the R-Car V3H (R8A77980) SoC in the R-Car DU bindings; the DU hardware seems the same as in the R-Car V3M (R8A77970).
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com
The patch is against the 'drm-next' branch of David Airlie's 'linux.git' repo.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Acked-by: Rob Herring robh@kernel.org
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org