https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108347
Bug ID: 108347 Summary: [regression, bisected] Performance drop in various games Product: Mesa Version: git Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Drivers/Gallium/radeonsi Assignee: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: gr.muench@gmail.com QA Contact: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Tesseract goes down from 402 to 385fps. (Using nir,sisched) I saw other games too with a performance regression. But the impact is smaller.
Extended renderer info (GLX_MESA_query_renderer): Vendor: X.Org (0x1002) Device: AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series (TAHITI, DRM 3.27.0, 4.19.0-2-amd-staging-drm-next-git, LLVM 8.0.0) (0x6798) Version: 18.3.0 Accelerated: yes Video memory: 3072MB Unified memory: no Preferred profile: core (0x1) Max core profile version: 4.5 Max compat profile version: 4.5 Max GLES1 profile version: 1.1 Max GLES[23] profile version: 3.2 Memory info (GL_ATI_meminfo): VBO free memory - total: 2876 MB, largest block: 2876 MB VBO free aux. memory - total: 2966 MB, largest block: 2966 MB Texture free memory - total: 2876 MB, largest block: 2876 MB Texture free aux. memory - total: 2966 MB, largest block: 2966 MB Renderbuffer free memory - total: 2876 MB, largest block: 2876 MB Renderbuffer free aux. memory - total: 2966 MB, largest block: 2966 MB Memory info (GL_NVX_gpu_memory_info): Dedicated video memory: 3072 MB Total available memory: 6144 MB Currently available dedicated video memory: 2876 MB OpenGL vendor string: X.Org OpenGL renderer string: AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series (TAHITI, DRM 3.27.0, 4.19.0-2-amd-staging-drm-next-git, LLVM 8.0.0) OpenGL core profile version string: 4.5 (Core Profile) Mesa 18.3.0-devel (git-4052624398) OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 4.50 OpenGL core profile context flags: (none) OpenGL core profile profile mask: core profile
OpenGL version string: 4.5 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 18.3.0-devel (git-4052624398) OpenGL shading language version string: 4.50 OpenGL context flags: (none) OpenGL profile mask: compatibility profile
OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.2 Mesa 18.3.0-devel (git-4052624398) OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES 3.20
f243980f2c1e8005dab0cbadf52eb4392feb2ecc is the first bad commit commit f243980f2c1e8005dab0cbadf52eb4392feb2ecc Author: Sonny Jiang sonny.jiang@amd.com Date: Wed Oct 3 11:53:11 2018 -0400
radeonsi:optimizing SET_CONTEXT_REG for shaders VS
Signed-off-by: Sonny Jiang sonny.jiang@amd.com Signed-off-by: Marek Olšák marek.olsak@amd.com
:040000 040000 e32a7539bb1a32c3c9d700651aa50f8dada31b5e 0e04f0305e4e893fdee0b394b5aa2c9c0bf0edaf M src
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108347
Gregor Münch gr.muench@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[regression, bisected] |[regression, bisected] |Performance drop in various |Performance drop in |games |Tesseract
--- Comment #1 from Gregor Münch gr.muench@gmail.com --- Here is a complete test result from comparing todays master with the commit right before the bisected commit. https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1810130-RA-MESAPERFO80
We see that without nir, the impact in Tesseract isnt that much. However with nir we see a regression from 412 to 397 fps, Dirt Rally drops from 108 to 107fps. Other games see mostly a small improvement, except Civ VI 36 to 37fps.
I will change the title as it mostly impacts Tesseract. Havent tested other games.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108347
--- Comment #2 from Marek Olšák maraeo@gmail.com --- I think the difference is due to the increase in CPU overhead.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108347
--- Comment #3 from Marek Olšák maraeo@gmail.com --- Tesseract is too simple so it's very sensitive to small changes in the CPU overhead. It's uncertain but likely that Steam games are unaffected. I'm undecided about whether we need to revert this or not.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108347
--- Comment #4 from Nicolai Hähnle nhaehnle@gmail.com --- Thanks for keeping an eye out for performance :)
The difference in settings isn't only about nir, but also sisched and noerror. Still a curious observation.
That said, with default settings, the patch seems like a (small, but statistically relevant) win in most cases. The exception of Tesseract really doesn't matter, nobody has 400 Hz displays. And the regression in Civ is unfortunate, but IIRC that's often notoriously CPU-bound.
I'd say the signs are slightly in favour of keeping the patch.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108347
GitLab Migration User gitlab-migration@fdo.invalid changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #5 from GitLab Migration User gitlab-migration@fdo.invalid --- -- GitLab Migration Automatic Message --
This bug has been migrated to freedesktop.org's GitLab instance and has been closed from further activity.
You can subscribe and participate further through the new bug through this link to our GitLab instance: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/issues/1337.
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
-
bugzilla-daemon＠freedesktop.org