Hi,

Static analysis on linux-next with Coverity had detected a minor issue in the following commit:

commit 2a74e8682a39d00e04ca278459ae7d7ecbdfb394 Author: Sam Ravnborg sam@ravnborg.org Date: Sat Nov 28 23:40:55 2020 +0100

video: fbdev: sis: Fix set but not used warnings in init.c

The analysis is as follows:

2659 if(SiS_Pr->UseCustomMode) { 2660 infoflag = SiS_Pr->CInfoFlag; 2661 } else {

Useless call (USELESS_CALL) side_effect_free: Calling SiS_GetResInfo(SiS_Pr, ModeNo, ModeIdIndex) is only useful for its return value, which is ignored.

2662 SiS_GetResInfo(SiS_Pr, ModeNo, ModeIdIndex); 2663 if(ModeNo > 0x13) { 2664 infoflag = SiS_Pr->SiS_RefIndex[RRTI].Ext_InfoFlag; 2665 } 2666 }

.. SiSGetResInfo() just returns an unsigned short and this returns a values is not being used. The function does not side effect anything, so it does look like a redundant call. Is this intentional?

3044 unsigned short 3045 SiS_GetResInfo(struct SiS_Private *SiS_Pr, unsigned short ModeNo, unsigned short ModeIdIndex) 3046 { 3047 if(ModeNo <= 0x13) 3048 return ((unsigned short)SiS_Pr->SiS_SModeIDTable[ModeIdIndex].St_ResInfo); 3049 else 3050 return ((unsigned short)SiS_Pr->SiS_EModeIDTable[ModeIdIndex].Ext_RESINFO); 3051 }

Colin