If atomic state is available, use this to read the current plane in GetCrtc/GetPlane, rather than the legacy points.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone daniels@collabora.com Cc: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@intel.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 5 ++++- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c | 8 ++++++-- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c index e75f62c..14c5807 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c @@ -357,7 +357,10 @@ int drm_mode_getcrtc(struct drm_device *dev,
drm_modeset_lock_crtc(crtc, crtc->primary); crtc_resp->gamma_size = crtc->gamma_size; - if (crtc->primary->fb) + + if (crtc->primary->state && crtc->primary->state->fb) + crtc_resp->fb_id = crtc->primary->state->fb->base.id; + else if (!crtc->primary->state && crtc->primary->fb) crtc_resp->fb_id = crtc->primary->fb->base.id; else crtc_resp->fb_id = 0; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c index 62b98f3..c2dc8e6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c @@ -392,12 +392,16 @@ int drm_mode_getplane(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, return -ENOENT;
drm_modeset_lock(&plane->mutex, NULL); - if (plane->crtc) + if (plane->state && plane->state->crtc) + plane_resp->crtc_id = plane->state->crtc->base.id; + else if (!plane->state && plane->crtc) plane_resp->crtc_id = plane->crtc->base.id; else plane_resp->crtc_id = 0;
- if (plane->fb) + if (plane->state && plane->state->fb) + plane_resp->fb_id = plane->state->fb->base.id; + else if (!plane->state && plane->fb) plane_resp->fb_id = plane->fb->base.id; else plane_resp->fb_id = 0;
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 06:19:12PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:
If atomic state is available, use this to read the current plane in GetCrtc/GetPlane, rather than the legacy points.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone daniels@collabora.com Cc: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@intel.com
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 5 ++++- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c | 8 ++++++-- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c index e75f62c..14c5807 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c @@ -357,7 +357,10 @@ int drm_mode_getcrtc(struct drm_device *dev,
drm_modeset_lock_crtc(crtc, crtc->primary); crtc_resp->gamma_size = crtc->gamma_size;
- if (crtc->primary->fb)
- if (crtc->primary->state && crtc->primary->state->fb)
crtc_resp->fb_id = crtc->primary->state->fb->base.id;
- else if (!crtc->primary->state && crtc->primary->fb) crtc_resp->fb_id = crtc->primary->fb->base.id;
I think what we do elsewhere is totally ignore the legacy junk if the ->state pointer exists.
else crtc_resp->fb_id = 0; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c index 62b98f3..c2dc8e6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c @@ -392,12 +392,16 @@ int drm_mode_getplane(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, return -ENOENT;
drm_modeset_lock(&plane->mutex, NULL);
- if (plane->crtc)
- if (plane->state && plane->state->crtc)
plane_resp->crtc_id = plane->state->crtc->base.id;
- else if (!plane->state && plane->crtc) plane_resp->crtc_id = plane->crtc->base.id; else plane_resp->crtc_id = 0;
- if (plane->fb)
- if (plane->state && plane->state->fb)
plane_resp->fb_id = plane->state->fb->base.id;
- else if (!plane->state && plane->fb) plane_resp->fb_id = plane->fb->base.id; else plane_resp->fb_id = 0;
-- 2.10.2
dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Hi,
On 13 Dec 2016, at 6:48 pm, Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 06:19:12PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote: @@ -357,7 +357,10 @@ int drm_mode_getcrtc(struct drm_device *dev,
drm_modeset_lock_crtc(crtc, crtc->primary); crtc_resp->gamma_size = crtc->gamma_size;
- if (crtc->primary->fb)
- if (crtc->primary->state && crtc->primary->state->fb)
crtc_resp->fb_id = crtc->primary->state->fb->base.id;
- else if (!crtc->primary->state && crtc->primary->fb) crtc_resp->fb_id = crtc->primary->fb->base.id;
I think what we do elsewhere is totally ignore the legacy junk if the ->state pointer exists.
Indeed, hence the negative state check on the second branch; having nested if statements instead seemed unnecessarily unwieldy, but the effect is the same.
[Obligatory mobile formatting apology.]
Cheers, Daniel
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 07:02:53PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi,
On 13 Dec 2016, at 6:48 pm, Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 06:19:12PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote: @@ -357,7 +357,10 @@ int drm_mode_getcrtc(struct drm_device *dev,
drm_modeset_lock_crtc(crtc, crtc->primary); crtc_resp->gamma_size = crtc->gamma_size;
- if (crtc->primary->fb)
- if (crtc->primary->state && crtc->primary->state->fb)
crtc_resp->fb_id = crtc->primary->state->fb->base.id;
- else if (!crtc->primary->state && crtc->primary->fb) crtc_resp->fb_id = crtc->primary->fb->base.id;
I think what we do elsewhere is totally ignore the legacy junk if the ->state pointer exists.
Indeed, hence the negative state check on the second branch; having nested if statements instead seemed unnecessarily unwieldy, but the effect is the same.
My bad. You hid it well though ;)
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:14:47PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 07:02:53PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi,
On 13 Dec 2016, at 6:48 pm, Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 06:19:12PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote: @@ -357,7 +357,10 @@ int drm_mode_getcrtc(struct drm_device *dev,
drm_modeset_lock_crtc(crtc, crtc->primary); crtc_resp->gamma_size = crtc->gamma_size;
- if (crtc->primary->fb)
- if (crtc->primary->state && crtc->primary->state->fb)
crtc_resp->fb_id = crtc->primary->state->fb->base.id;
- else if (!crtc->primary->state && crtc->primary->fb) crtc_resp->fb_id = crtc->primary->fb->base.id;
I think what we do elsewhere is totally ignore the legacy junk if the ->state pointer exists.
Indeed, hence the negative state check on the second branch; having nested if statements instead seemed unnecessarily unwieldy, but the effect is the same.
My bad. You hid it well though ;)
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Applied to drm-misc, thanks. -Daniel
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org