drm/i915 is the only user of the color allocation handling and switched to insert_node a while ago. So we can ditch this.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch --- include/drm/drm_mm.h | 31 ------------------------------- 1 file changed, 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_mm.h b/include/drm/drm_mm.h index 88591ef..ab240f1 100644 --- a/include/drm/drm_mm.h +++ b/include/drm/drm_mm.h @@ -177,17 +177,6 @@ static inline struct drm_mm_node *drm_mm_get_block_range( return drm_mm_get_block_range_generic(parent, size, alignment, 0, start, end, 0); } -static inline struct drm_mm_node *drm_mm_get_color_block_range( - struct drm_mm_node *parent, - unsigned long size, - unsigned alignment, - unsigned long color, - unsigned long start, - unsigned long end) -{ - return drm_mm_get_block_range_generic(parent, size, alignment, color, - start, end, 0); -} static inline struct drm_mm_node *drm_mm_get_block_atomic_range( struct drm_mm_node *parent, unsigned long size, @@ -255,26 +244,6 @@ static inline struct drm_mm_node *drm_mm_search_free_in_range( return drm_mm_search_free_in_range_generic(mm, size, alignment, 0, start, end, best_match); } -static inline struct drm_mm_node *drm_mm_search_free_color(const struct drm_mm *mm, - unsigned long size, - unsigned alignment, - unsigned long color, - bool best_match) -{ - return drm_mm_search_free_generic(mm,size, alignment, color, best_match); -} -static inline struct drm_mm_node *drm_mm_search_free_in_range_color( - const struct drm_mm *mm, - unsigned long size, - unsigned alignment, - unsigned long color, - unsigned long start, - unsigned long end, - bool best_match) -{ - return drm_mm_search_free_in_range_generic(mm, size, alignment, color, - start, end, best_match); -} extern int drm_mm_init(struct drm_mm *mm, unsigned long start, unsigned long size);
When converting to the preallocated drm_mm_node interfaces in
commit dc9dd7a20fde95aa81a8307cde79c2dff9f83f3d Author: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Date: Fri Dec 7 20:37:07 2012 +0000
drm/i915: Preallocate the drm_mm_node prior to manipulating the GTT drm_mm
only the allocation side was converted, but not the freeing. Fix this up.
Note that the only difference between put_block and remove_node is that the former fills up the preallocation cache. Which we don't need anyway and hence is just wasted space.
Cc: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: Ben Widawsky ben@bwidawsk.net Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c index 4200c32..30fd694 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c @@ -2620,7 +2620,7 @@ i915_gem_object_unbind(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) /* Avoid an unnecessary call to unbind on rebind. */ obj->map_and_fenceable = true;
- drm_mm_put_block(obj->gtt_space); + drm_mm_remove_node(obj->gtt_space); obj->gtt_space = NULL; obj->gtt_offset = 0;
@@ -3137,14 +3137,14 @@ search_free: } if (WARN_ON(!i915_gem_valid_gtt_space(dev, node, obj->cache_level))) { i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(obj); - drm_mm_put_block(node); + drm_mm_remove_node(node); return -EINVAL; }
ret = i915_gem_gtt_prepare_object(obj); if (ret) { i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(obj); - drm_mm_put_block(node); + drm_mm_remove_node(node); return ret; }
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:05:54PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
When converting to the preallocated drm_mm_node interfaces in
commit dc9dd7a20fde95aa81a8307cde79c2dff9f83f3d Author: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Date: Fri Dec 7 20:37:07 2012 +0000
drm/i915: Preallocate the drm_mm_node prior to manipulating the GTT drm_mm
only the allocation side was converted, but not the freeing. Fix this up.
Note that the only difference between put_block and remove_node is that the former fills up the preallocation cache. Which we don't need anyway and hence is just wasted space.
Cc: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: Ben Widawsky ben@bwidawsk.net Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
You learn something new every day. Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk -Chris
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 09:16:56PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:05:54PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
When converting to the preallocated drm_mm_node interfaces in
commit dc9dd7a20fde95aa81a8307cde79c2dff9f83f3d Author: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Date: Fri Dec 7 20:37:07 2012 +0000
drm/i915: Preallocate the drm_mm_node prior to manipulating the GTT drm_mm
only the allocation side was converted, but not the freeing. Fix this up.
Note that the only difference between put_block and remove_node is that the former fills up the preallocation cache. Which we don't need anyway and hence is just wasted space.
Cc: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: Ben Widawsky ben@bwidawsk.net Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
You learn something new every day. Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The lack of kfree in this patch might be a problem ...
/me tries again -Daniel
Hi
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch wrote:
When converting to the preallocated drm_mm_node interfaces in
commit dc9dd7a20fde95aa81a8307cde79c2dff9f83f3d Author: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Date: Fri Dec 7 20:37:07 2012 +0000
drm/i915: Preallocate the drm_mm_node prior to manipulating the GTT drm_mm
only the allocation side was converted, but not the freeing. Fix this up.
Note that the only difference between put_block and remove_node is that the former fills up the preallocation cache. Which we don't need anyway and hence is just wasted space.
Cc: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: Ben Widawsky ben@bwidawsk.net Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c index 4200c32..30fd694 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c @@ -2620,7 +2620,7 @@ i915_gem_object_unbind(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) /* Avoid an unnecessary call to unbind on rebind. */ obj->map_and_fenceable = true;
drm_mm_put_block(obj->gtt_space);
drm_mm_remove_node(obj->gtt_space);
kfree(obj->gtt_space);
obj->gtt_space = NULL; obj->gtt_offset = 0;
@@ -3137,14 +3137,14 @@ search_free: } if (WARN_ON(!i915_gem_valid_gtt_space(dev, node, obj->cache_level))) { i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(obj);
drm_mm_put_block(node);
drm_mm_remove_node(node);
kfree(node);
return -EINVAL; } ret = i915_gem_gtt_prepare_object(obj); if (ret) { i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(obj);
drm_mm_put_block(node);
drm_mm_remove_node(node);
kfree(node);
drm_mm_remove_node() does unlink the node but not remove it. Btw., I have these fixes in my series, too. I will push it later and write the git-link to #dri-devel.
Cheers David
return ret; }
-- 1.7.11.7
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:21:57PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch wrote:
When converting to the preallocated drm_mm_node interfaces in
commit dc9dd7a20fde95aa81a8307cde79c2dff9f83f3d Author: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Date: Fri Dec 7 20:37:07 2012 +0000
drm/i915: Preallocate the drm_mm_node prior to manipulating the GTT drm_mm
only the allocation side was converted, but not the freeing. Fix this up.
Note that the only difference between put_block and remove_node is that the former fills up the preallocation cache. Which we don't need anyway and hence is just wasted space.
Cc: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: Ben Widawsky ben@bwidawsk.net Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c index 4200c32..30fd694 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c @@ -2620,7 +2620,7 @@ i915_gem_object_unbind(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) /* Avoid an unnecessary call to unbind on rebind. */ obj->map_and_fenceable = true;
drm_mm_put_block(obj->gtt_space);
drm_mm_remove_node(obj->gtt_space);
kfree(obj->gtt_space);
obj->gtt_space = NULL; obj->gtt_offset = 0;
@@ -3137,14 +3137,14 @@ search_free: } if (WARN_ON(!i915_gem_valid_gtt_space(dev, node, obj->cache_level))) { i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(obj);
drm_mm_put_block(node);
drm_mm_remove_node(node);
kfree(node);
return -EINVAL; } ret = i915_gem_gtt_prepare_object(obj); if (ret) { i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(obj);
drm_mm_put_block(node);
drm_mm_remove_node(node);
kfree(node);
Yeah, I fail ...
drm_mm_remove_node() does unlink the node but not remove it. Btw., I have these fixes in my series, too. I will push it later and write the git-link to #dri-devel.
We have patches in-flight to convert over to embedded drm_mm_nodes anyway, so I guess that part will solve itself automatically. -Daniel
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:39:03PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:21:57PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch wrote:
When converting to the preallocated drm_mm_node interfaces in
commit dc9dd7a20fde95aa81a8307cde79c2dff9f83f3d Author: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Date: Fri Dec 7 20:37:07 2012 +0000
drm/i915: Preallocate the drm_mm_node prior to manipulating the GTT drm_mm
only the allocation side was converted, but not the freeing. Fix this up.
Note that the only difference between put_block and remove_node is that the former fills up the preallocation cache. Which we don't need anyway and hence is just wasted space.
Cc: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: Ben Widawsky ben@bwidawsk.net Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c index 4200c32..30fd694 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c @@ -2620,7 +2620,7 @@ i915_gem_object_unbind(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) /* Avoid an unnecessary call to unbind on rebind. */ obj->map_and_fenceable = true;
drm_mm_put_block(obj->gtt_space);
drm_mm_remove_node(obj->gtt_space);
kfree(obj->gtt_space);
obj->gtt_space = NULL; obj->gtt_offset = 0;
@@ -3137,14 +3137,14 @@ search_free: } if (WARN_ON(!i915_gem_valid_gtt_space(dev, node, obj->cache_level))) { i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(obj);
drm_mm_put_block(node);
drm_mm_remove_node(node);
kfree(node);
return -EINVAL; } ret = i915_gem_gtt_prepare_object(obj); if (ret) { i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(obj);
drm_mm_put_block(node);
drm_mm_remove_node(node);
kfree(node);
Yeah, I fail ...
drm_mm_remove_node() does unlink the node but not remove it. Btw., I have these fixes in my series, too. I will push it later and write the git-link to #dri-devel.
We have patches in-flight to convert over to embedded drm_mm_nodes anyway, so I guess that part will solve itself automatically. -Daniel
I'm planning to get this out ASAP. I'm a bit confused now though what I actually need to send.
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Ben Widawsky ben@bwidawsk.net wrote:
drm_mm_remove_node() does unlink the node but not remove it. Btw., I have these fixes in my series, too. I will push it later and write the git-link to #dri-devel.
We have patches in-flight to convert over to embedded drm_mm_nodes anyway, so I guess that part will solve itself automatically.
I'm planning to get this out ASAP. I'm a bit confused now though what I actually need to send.
I think for now just the top-down allocator + the create_node stuff for stolen memory. I guess the conversion to embed the gtt_space drm_mm_node will take a bit longer. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:05:53PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
drm/i915 is the only user of the color allocation handling and switched to insert_node a while ago. So we can ditch this.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
If you build it, they will come. Lies! Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk -Chris
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org