On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Maninder Singh maninder1.s@samsung.com wrote:

Currently pdd is validate after dereferencing it, which is not correct, Thus validate pdd before its first use.

Signed-off-by: Maninder Singh maninder1.s@samsung.com

v1: remove validation of pdd after its usage v2: do validation at first place rather than removing

drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c index 8a1f999..9be0070 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c @@ -420,6 +420,12 @@ void kfd_unbind_process_from_device(struct kfd_dev *dev, unsigned int pasid) pqm_uninit(&p->pqm);

    pdd = kfd_get_process_device_data(dev, p);

•   if (!pdd) {
  

•           mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
  

•           return;
  

•   }
  

•   if (pdd->reset_wavefronts) {
            dbgdev_wave_reset_wavefronts(pdd->dev, p);
            pdd->reset_wavefronts = false;
  

@@ -431,8 +437,7 @@ void kfd_unbind_process_from_device(struct kfd_dev *dev, unsigned int pasid) * We don't call amd_iommu_unbind_pasid() here * because the IOMMU called us. */

•   if (pdd)
  

•           pdd->bound = false;
  

•   pdd->bound = false;
  
    mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
  

}

1.7.9.5

Thanks! Applied to my -fixes tree.

Oded